The NSA collects everything -
and everything is known about
Hillary Clinton's online activities by persons
who have the clearances at NSA
to know.
The same FBI unit which gathered
the evidence that led to the
conviction of former DCI, David
Petraeus is working on Hillary's
case. If they're unable to bring a
case against Hillary, there's a
possibility that she's corrupted
everyone and anyone who can
harm her, either through
blackmail or bribery.
Recently, Washington Post
Columnist, Charles Krauthammer
opined that he had no doubt at
least some of the 30K+ emails
Hillary deleted from her private
email server had references to the
Clinton Foundation, which would
reveal illegal activities and having
a conflict of interest.
This is a brief summary of how
the Clinton Foundation works as
a tax free international money
laundering operation.
1. It's a separate foreign "charity".
The Clinton Foundation was set up
in Canada.
2. Foreign governments and oligarchs
send donations to this Canadian
charity. Hundreds of leaders have
thus far contributed several hundreds
of millions.
3. The Canadian charity bundled up
these separate donations and has
made massive donations to the
Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the
cooperating Canadian charity claim
Canadian law prohibits the
identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then
spends some of its money for
legitimate good works programs.
Unfortunately, experts believe this
is on the order of 10%. Much of the
balance goes to pay the Clintons,
as well as a vast number of their
hangers-on, to fund lavish travel,
etc.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with
access to the world's best
accountants has somehow failed to
report much of this on their tax
filings. They've discovered these
"clerical errors" and have begun
refiling 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result - foreign money goes
into the Clinton's pockets tax free
and untraceable back to the original
donor. This is called money
laundering.
8. Why did these foreign interests
funnel money through a Canadian
charity? Why not directly to the
Clinton Foundation or directly to the
people, organizations and countries
in need?
Hillary's destruction of 30,000+
emails was a risk she was willing to
take, because her Foundation's
income is so massive.
Meanwhile, the Kremlin is currently
debating on whether to release the
20,000 emails that they hacked
from her unsecured email account...
0 comments:
Post a Comment