Friday, February 27, 2015

Only for the curious: Why our weather is the way it is now - informative video

Unfortunately, most people will not be interested. And will be convinced by the government's "Nothing to see here -- just conspiracy nuts -- move along...."    Years into the future, when all of this has been proven to be true--to everyone--it will be too late to do anything about it.  Sadly, this is how Earth humans learn--too little, too late.  The following video is for those who care what is happening to our planet and to us -- and want to know the truth NOW. 

Engineered Winter, Engineered Drought

By Dane Wigington
 
 
Earth's climate system is being manipulated and forced in too many directions to comprehend. Governments around the globe are participating in the climate engineering not only over their own countries, there is also the weather warfare aspect between opposing countries.

Those in pursuit of power have turned our once pristine blue skies into a battlefield. Geoengineering is nothing short of an all out assault against Nature. Truly untainted weather is non existent, deep blue skies are no more. From record snows to record heat and drought, all is now being manipulated by the ecologically devastating climate engineering programs.


Each of us must continue to help sound the alarm on the geoengineering insanity so
that when the population is forced to wake up (due to the rapidly accelerating devastation that is occurring), they will know just how horrifically they have been violated by those in power. Make your voice heard, share credible data with others, start "spot fires" of awareness wherever you go. The short video at the link below outlines the ongoing engineered devastation.
 
 
Share:

Thursday, February 26, 2015

Curious folks may find this site interesting

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/exopolitica/esp_exopolitics_Q_0.htm

It tells about President Eisenhower's contact with extraterrestrials in 1954.  You may be tempted to dismiss this lightly or out of hand -- but first, please read the info. on the site and then make your own judgment based on what you have read. You may even want to explore further, if you find it intriguing.

Here's the beginning:

Introduction ]


On the night and early hours of February 20-21, 1954, while on a 'vacation' to Palm Springs, California, President Dwight Eisenhower went missing and allegedly was taken to Edwards Air force base for a secret meeting.

 

When he showed up the next morning at a church service in Los Angeles, reporters were told that he had to have emergency dental treatment the previous evening and had visited a local dentist.

 

The dentist later appeared at a function that evening and presented as the 'dentist' who had treated Eisenhower. The missing night and morning has subsequently fueled rumors that Eisenhower was using the alleged dentist visit as a cover story for an extraordinary event.

 

The event is possibly the most significant that any American President could have conducted: an alleged 'First Contact' meeting with extraterrestrials at Edwards Air Force base (previously Muroc Airfield), and the beginning of a series of meetings with different extraterrestrial races that led to a 'treaty' that was eventually signed. This astonishing First Contact event, if it occurred, will experience its 50th anniversary on February 20-21, 2004.

This paper explores the evidence that the First Contact meeting had occurred with extraterrestrials with a distinctive 'Nordic' appearance, the likelihood of an agreement having been spurned with this 'Nordic race', the start of a series of meetings that led to a treaty eventually being signed with a different extraterrestrial race dubbed the 'Greys', and the motivations of the different extraterrestrial races involved in these treaty discussions.

 

The paper will further examine why these events were kept secret for so long, the significance of the 50th anniversary of Eisenhower's meeting with extraterrestrials, and whether an official disclosure announcement is likely in the near future.

 


Circumstantial Evidence Supporting Eisenhower's 'First Contact' Meeting with Extraterrestrials


There is circumstantial and testimonial evidence supporting Eisenhower's meeting with extraterrestrials and the start of a series of meetings that culminated in the signing of a treaty with a different group of extraterrestrials.

 

The most intriguing are circumstances surrounding Eisenhower's alleged winter vacation to Palm Springs, California from February 17-24, 1954. Firstly, the "vacation for the President" which was announced rather suddenly and came less than a week after Eisenhower's 'quail shooting' vacation in Georgia. According to UFO researcher, William Moore, all this was quite unusual and suggested that there was more to the one week visit to Palm Springs than a simple holiday. 

Second, on the Saturday night of February 20, President Eisenhower did go missing, fueling press speculation that he had taken ill or even died. In a hastily convened press conference, Eisenhower's Press Secretary announced that Eisenhower had lost a tooth cap while eating fried chicken and had to be rushed to a local dentist. The local dentist was introduced at an official function on Sunday February 21, as "the dentist who had treated the president". 

 

Moore's investigation of the incident concluded that the dentist's visit was being used as a cover story for Eisenhower's true whereabouts.

Consequently, Eisenhower was missing for an entire evening and could easily have been taken from Palm Springs to the nearby Muroc Airfield, later renamed Edwards Air Force base. The unscheduled nature of the President's vacation, the missing President and the dentist cover story provide circumstantial evidence that the true purpose of his Palm Springs vacation was for him to attend an event whose importance was such that it could not be disclosed to the general public.

 

A meeting with extraterrestrials may well have been the true purpose of his visit.


Gerald Light's Letter That Eisenhower Met With Extraterrestrials


The first public source alleging a meeting with extraterrestrials was Gerald Light who in a letter dated April 16, 1954 to Meade Layne, the then director of Borderland Sciences Research Associates (now Foundation), claimed he was part of a delegation of community leaders to an alleged meeting with extraterrestrials at Edwards Air Force Base.To read this letter, go to
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/exopolitica/esp_exopolitics_Q_0.htm


Share:

Videographer captures green flash as sun sets in Hawaii

Turns out that elusive, often-watched-for but seldom-seen, green flash is real. Finally captured for all to see on video.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/25/green-flash-sunset_n_6748184.html?cps=gravity_2246_5308229983553349748

And catch this one -- a purple UFO over Peru videotaped and seen by thousands:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/23/purple-ufo-over-peru_n_6690652.html?cps=gravity_2444_4941425322324711237
Share:

Tuesday, February 24, 2015

I just watched the documentary Citizen Four on HBO

A most chilling presentation. Highly recommended for all to view. We are all under constant surveillance by the government.  At the time the documentary was made in 2013 and 2014, 1.2 million of us were on the govt. watchlist -- am sure the number is much higher by now.  The dream we had that we were living in a democracy with freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution is now revealed to be just that: a dream that has turned out to be a nightmare.  Everyone should see this film.  Unfortunately, not everyone will believe it.  The mentally challenged voters who still think of this country as the "land of the free, etc." will continue to believe Edward Snowden (a true hero!) is a traitor and they will continue to vote against their own interests. 
Not that that makes any difference anymore, given that we have no real political choices and are all under the rule of an oligarchy with tentacles that reach into our every phone call and e-mail.  Privacy/liberty/freedom, if ever we had it, is now a thing of the past.

Tragically, not many seem to be at all disturbed about any of this. Outcry and outrage --or even fear-- are nowhere to be seen in the docile chickens in their coop, even as the ax is descending over their heads. Fox News viewers believe, as they are told, that Edward Snowden is a traitor.  They are the same ones who believed Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz when they lied that Iraq was behind 9/11 and that we would be seen as saviors if we attacked that country.  Jeb Bush has just named Wolfowitz as one of his advisers for his presidential run.

Sigh.  


See the trailer and read the review at:  http://guardianlv.com/2014/12/citizen-four-disturbing-documentary-review-and-trailer/

EXCERPT from article:

Equally disturbing is the apathetic and lethargic response by Mr. and Mrs. Average. While one would have thought that citizens would be outraged at this information, this has not happened. Only a portion of the population are disturbed and presumably the mainstream denizens of the United States will view this documentary with the same lackluster interest that they gave PRISM and the NSA revelations.

Citizen Four: Disturbing Documentary (Review and Trailer)

Director, producer and cinematographer Laura Poitras reveals her interviews with Edward Snowden after being approached by him when Snowden sent her emails under the name Citizen Four and this disturbing documentary about the whistleblower who shined the light on the NSA and its illegal and nefarious spying on the public in the film. There may be someone in the world who has not heard of Snowden, or Julian Assange or the NSA or the FBI but it is unlikely unless said individual has been living under a rock or in outer space. Snowdon is the American who now lives in Russia, until further notice, and is "the world's most wanted man."

Poitras knows quite a lot about "being wanted" the documentary filmmaker learned about government surveillance first hand after her film, the 2006 made-for-television film My Country, My Country was aired, she was placed on the Department of Homeland Security list for monitoring and Laura was told by airport security that her "threat rating" is the highest that the DHS gives out. All this before her Citizen Four documentary focusing on the National Security Agency (NSA) and the recorded conversations of Edward Snowden, Poitras, Greenwald and MacAskill in a hotel room in Hong Kong.

Whether one believes in any other post 9/11 conspiracy theories or not, the documentary Citizen Four is disturbing and chills run down the spine of the viewer as a piece of history appears on camera. This interview took place before any of the world players got involved. Certainly Julian Assange has a small part in the film, not at the beginning of this tale, but towards the end. Snowdon contacted Poitras almost anonymously at first but after she learned who he was, the entire set of interviews were "hidden" from public view.

It is fascinating to see the story unfold and to see the whistleblower realize that despite his best intentions, the story becomes about him. Before earning his notoriety and getting placed on the world's most wanted list, Snowden and Poitras reveal just how "un" private the average citizen's lives are. Viewers also find out that the NSA have never been above lying about their activities and just how much information this government organization has access to and how much it retrieves.

Perhaps more disturbing is the knowledge that the NSA uses social media, like Facebook, to gather information about people on their lists and Mr. and Mrs. Public. Last year, the world learned about PRISM and how companies like AT&T, Microsoft and Facebook, et al, willingly gave the government access to people's private information on a regular basis. Equally disturbing is the apathetic and lethargic response by Mr. and Mrs. Average. While one would have thought that citizens would be outraged at this information, this has not happened. Only a portion of the population are disturbed and presumably the mainstream denizens of the United States will view this documentary with the same lackluster interest that they gave PRISM and the NSA revelations.

As one reviewer has said, Citizen Four shows history "unfolding" before the viewers eyes in this disturbing documentary and at a time where cyber terrorists just forced a major Hollywood studio to pull its Christmas release, watching Laura Poitras' film is proof that the Internet, along with other computerized forms of communication, is a dangerous place for everyone, not just Sony Entertainment, but for every person who uses the world wide web for any reason. Citizen Four is still showing in select theaters across the United States. Prepare to be horrified at just how much privacy the average citizen does not have.


Read more at http://guardianlv.com/2014/12/citizen-four-disturbing-documentary-review-and-trailer/#B07VaBRBsUcyKGhT.99
Share:

Saturday, February 21, 2015

Another Bush? REALLY? Give us a break!

Am glad to see Maureen Dowd telling the truth about the Clintons and the Bushes. Something so seldom heard from any mainstream news reporter.  Refreshing, to say the least. Not that it will make any difference in the same old garbage served up to us as our "choices" at voting time. We fool ourselves if we think we really have any power to make good choices for ourselves and our country. We have to take what the elite rulers allow us to have in the list of bought-and-paid-for puppets put in place to carry out their will. 

JEB BUSH'S BRAINLESS TRUST
By Maureen Dowd

WASHINGTON — I had been keeping an open mind on Jeb Bush.

I mean, sure, as Florida governor, he helped his brother snatch the 2000 election. And that led to two decade-long botched wars that cost tens of thousands of lives and trillions of dollars. The nation will be dealing for a long time with struggling veterans and the loss of American prestige. Not to mention that W. let Wall Street gamble away the economy, which is only now finally creeping back.

But, all that aside, shouldn't John Ellis Bush have the right to make the case that he is his own man?

In his foreign policy speech in Chicago on Wednesday, Jeb was dismissive toward those who want to know where he stands in relation to his father and brother. "In fact," he said, mockingly, "this is a great, fascinating thing in the political world for some reason."

For some reason?

Like the Clintons, the Bushes drag the country through national traumas that spring from their convoluted family dynamic and then disingenuously wonder why we concern ourselves with their family dynamic.

Without their last names, Hillary and Jeb would not be front-runners, buoyed by networks of donors grateful for appointments or favors bestowed by the family. (When Jeb and W. ran gubernatorial races in 1994, they both mined their mother's Christmas card list for donors.)

Yet Jeb is bristling with Jane Austen-style condescension, acting as though he would still be where he is if his last name were Tree. The last two presidents in his party were his father and brother, and his brother crashed the family station wagon into the globe, and Jeb is going to have to address that more thoroughly than saying "there were mistakes made in Iraq for sure."

He says he doesn't want to focus on "the past," and who can blame him? But how can he talk about leading America into the future if he can't honestly assess the past, or his family's controversial imprint?

In his speech, he blamed President Obama for the void that hatched ISIS, which he also noted didn't exist in 2003 at the dawn of "the liberation of Iraq." Actually, his brother's invasion of Iraq is what spawned Al Qaeda in Iraq, which drew from an insurgency of Sunni soldiers angry about being thrown out of work by the amateurish and vainglorious viceroy, Paul Bremer.

Although Jeb likes to act as though his family is irrelevant to his ambitions, Bushworld stalwarts recite the Bush dynasty narrative like a favorite fairy tale:

The wonky Jeb, not the cocky W., was always 41's hope. H.W. and Bar never thought W., unprepared, unruly and with a chip on his shoulder, would be president. His parents' assumption that he was The One got in Jeb's head and now the 62-year-old feels he needs "to try to correct and make up for some of W.'s mistakes," as one family friend put it. The older Bush circle seems confident that Jeb sided with his father and Brent Scowcroft on the folly of letting the neocons push America into diverting from Osama to Saddam.

So for Bushworld, Jeb is the redeemer, the one who listens and talks in full sentences that make sense, the one who will restore the luster of the Bush name. But if you want to be your own person, you have to come up with your own people.

W. was a boy king, propped up by regents supplied by his father. Since he knew nothing about foreign affairs, his father surrounded him with his own advisers: Colin Powell, Condi Rice and Dick Cheney, who joined up with his pal Donald Rumsfeld and absconded with W.'s presidency.

Jeb, too, wanted to bolster his negligible foreign policy cred, so the day of his speech, his aide released a list of 21 advisers, 19 of whom had worked in the administrations of his father and his brother. The list starts with the estimable James Baker. But then it shockingly veers into warmongers.

It's mind-boggling, but there's Paul Wolfowitz, the unapologetic designer of the doctrine of unilateralism and pre-emption, the naïve cheerleader for the Iraq invasion and the man who assured Congress that Iraqi oil would pay for the country's reconstruction and that it was ridiculous to think we would need as many troops to control the country as Gen. Eric Shinseki, then the Army chief of staff, suggested.

There's John Hannah, Cheney's national security adviser (cultivated by the scheming Ahmed Chalabi), who tried to stuff hyped-up junk on Saddam into Powell's U.N. speech and who harbored bellicose ambitions about Iran; Stephen Hadley, who let the false 16-word assertion about Saddam trying to buy yellowcake in Niger into W.'s 2003 State of the Union; Porter Goss, the former C.I.A. director who defended waterboarding.

There's Michael Hayden, who publicly misled Congress about warrantless wiretapping and torture, and Michael Chertoff, the Homeland Security secretary who fumbled Katrina.

Jeb is also getting advice from Condi Rice, queen of the apocalyptic mushroom cloud. And in his speech he twice praised a supporter, Henry Kissinger, who advised prolonging the Vietnam War, which the Nixon White House thought might help with the 1972 election.

Why not bring back Scooter Libby?

If he wants to reclaim the Bush honor, Jeb should be holding accountable those who inflicted deep scars on America, not holding court with them.

Where's the shame?

For some reason, Jeb doesn't see it.


Share:

UFO/ET Info: Linda Moulton Howe: ET Resurrection Annunaki and Interdimensional War

Linda Moulton Howe is a professional credentialed journalist who has delved deeply into the UFO info. since the beginning...this is an interview of her this year (2015) in which she outlines a great deal of what she has learned through the years.  I have attended several conferences in which she was a featured speaker. She is a dedicated and trustable source of information.  Fascinating stuff.  The interview is 2 and a half hours long -- well worth watching in entirety for anyone who has curiosity about UFOs, extraterrestrials, the origins of the human race, multi-dimensions, etc. 

http://www.forbiddenknowledgetv.com/videos/ufosinterdimensionalbreakaway-civilization/linda-moulton-howe-et-resurrection-annunaki--interdimensional-war.html

Join Dark Journalist as he interviews 
acclaimed investigative reporter, 
Emmy-award winning TV producer 
and star of Ancient Aliens and Coast 
to Coast AM's, Linda Moulton Howe 
in a special, extended episode that 
delves deeply into her career of 
exposing the controversial alien 
reality.

In this rare and revealing, in-depth 
interview, Linda Moulton Howe 
explains her stunning conclusions 
after years of research about what 
the worldwide UFO abduction 
phenomena is really all about. She 
postulates that some of the off-world 
visitors may be trying to help humanity 
deal with other malevolent ETs that 
want to enslave the entire planet and 
are also in a desperate search to save 
their own dying species!

In a stunning revelation based on 
years of abductee testimony, she 
asserts that the aliens possess ET 
Resurrection Technology and that in 
their experiments of re-animating 
human life, they are seeking to help 
human souls master the consciousness 
of inter-dimensional travel and to stop 
us from completely destroying the 
delicate balance between worlds, 
dimensions and timelines.

She goes further and reveals that in 
ancient times, humankind was improved 
through DNA genetic engineering by an 
interstellar race of Anunnaki space 
travelers that wanted to use them for 
slave labor but that two ET factions 
arose and battled over the future plight 
of the emerging Homo sapien and that 
the battle is raging on even now!

Howe recalls her rise to prominence as 
a young reporter covering the wave of 
cattle mutilations across the country 
and making the documentary "A Strange 
Harvest." She recalls her personal 
struggle of fighting desperately to get 
the truth out about UFO encounters that 
quickly made her a target of intelligence 
surveillance by covert groups seeking to 
keep the truth on the ET reality hidden.

She also looks at the dark and foreboding 
trends of government suppression of the 
truth about UFOs and the erosion of public 
trust in the political leadership that is 
acting like puppets being run by a small 
group of elites that are hoarding reverse-
engineered advanced alien technology and 
conspire to use it for global military 
supremacy.

Riveting, controversial, eye-opening, 
unnerving and overflowing with shocking 
revelations, that have existential implications 
for the human race, this is the Linda Moulton 
Howe interview you've been waiting for!



Share:

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

Intelligent observation from the White House

An eminently sensible quote from Obama is contained within the following editorial:

NEW  YORKER EDITORIAL:  OBAMA--HISTORY AND A HISTORIC PRESIDENCY
By David Remnick

The push and pull, the advance and retrenchment, of history is not unique to any era, but it is plainly central to this one. The election of Barack Obama, the first African-American President, came while a significant portion of the electorate believed him to be lying about his origins, his politics, and his religion––a phenomenon captured in Barry Blitt's notorious preëlection "fist bump" cover, in 2008. The promise of 1989-91 has stalled, for now, in the authoritarian regimes in Moscow and Beijing. The Arab Spring has ended with a military-backed regime in Cairo, civil war in Syria, and a fanatical would-be caliphate under the banner of isis. At home, the empowerment, and marriage rights, of gay men and lesbians coexists with the lingering legacy of racial tension. The awareness of nearly all the world's leaders of the imminence of devastating climate change has roused almost none of them to effective action.

Nor has the overwhelming rise of the Internet overwhelmed the forces of cruelty. History is unawed. Part of the Obama temperament––infuriating to some, inspiringly sane to others––is to recognize that reality. "I think we are born into this world and inherit all the grudges and rivalries and hatreds and sins of the past," the President said in a series of interviews for The New Yorker. "But we also inherit the beauty and the joy and goodness of our forebears. And we're on this planet a pretty short time, so that we cannot remake the world entirely during this little stretch that we have. But I think our decisions matter." He added, "At the end of the day, we're part of a long-running story. We just try to get our paragraph right."


Share:

Sunday, February 15, 2015

Maureen Dowd tells truth bout the Clintons--and will pay for it

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/opinion/sunday/maureen-dowd-call-off-the-dogs.html?ref=opinion&_r=1

As Dowd says, the Clintons will be calling out the Rottweilers in retaliation against her.... but she tells the truth about them--in spades.

WASHINGTON — I'LL pay for this column.

The Rottweilers will be unleashed.

Once the Clintons had a War Room. Now they have a Slime Room.

Once they had the sly James Carville, fondly known as "serpenthead." Now they have the slippery David Brock, accurately known as a snake.

Brock fits into the Clinton tradition of opportunistic knife-fighters like Dick Morris and Mark Penn.

The silver-haired 52-year-old, who sports colorful designer suits and once wore a monocle, brawled his way into a Times article about the uneasy marriage between Hillary Clinton's veteran attack dogs and the group of advisers who are moving over from Obamaland.

Hillary hasn't announced a 2016 campaign yet. She's busy polling more than 200 policy experts on how to show that she really cares about the poor while courting the banks. Yet her shadow campaign is already in a déjà-vu-all-over-again shark fight over control of the candidate and her money. It's the same old story: The killer organization that, even with all its ruthless hired guns, can't quite shoot straight.

Squabbling competing factions helped Hillary squander a quarter-of-a-billion dollars in 2008.

As Nicholas Confessore and Amy Chozick chronicled, the nasty dispute spilled into public and Brock resigned last week from the board of a pro-Clinton "super-PAC" called Priorities USA Action — whose co-chairman is Jim Messina, Obama's 2012 campaign manager — accusing the political action committee of "an orchestrated political hit job" and "the kind of dirty trick I've witnessed in the right-wing and would not tolerate then."

He should know.

The former "right-wing hit man," and impresario of "dirty tricks," as Brock has said of himself, made his living in the '90s sliming Anita Hill as "a little bit nutty and a little bit slutty" and breaking the Troopergate story, which accused Arkansas state troopers of setting up liaisons for Bill Clinton and spurred Paula Jones's 1994 sexual harassment lawsuit.

He has tried to discredit anyone who disagreed with his ideological hits (myself and reporters I know included). And that's still the business he's in, simply on the other side as a Hillary zealot. (His conversion began in 1996 when he published a biography of Hillary that was not a total hit job and that began the thaw.)

Just as Bill Clinton was able to forgive another architect of the vast right-wing conspiracy, Richard Mellon Scaife, once Scaife was charmed by Hillary in person and began giving money to the Clinton foundation, so, too, was Bill won over by Brock's book, "Blinded by the Right: The Conscience of an Ex-Conservative," and Brock's Media Matters and Correct the Record websites, which ferociously push back against any Hillary coverage that isn't fawning.

With the understood blessing of the Clintons, Brock runs a $28 million cluster of media monitoring groups and oppo research organizations that are vehicles to rebut and at times discredit and threaten anyone who casts a gimlet eye at Clinton Inc.

As Confessore and Chozick wrote, he uses a fund-raiser named Mary Pat Bonner, whose firm has collected millions of dollars in commissions — a practice many fund-raising experts consider unethical.

Everyone wants to be at the trough for this one because Hillary is likely to raise, and more important, spend more than $1 billion on her campaign.

The Clinton crowd is trying to woo Brock back into the fold because he's good at getting money and knows how their enemies think. The Clintons appreciate the fact that Brock, like Morris, is a take-no-prisoners type with the ethical compass of a jackal. Baked in the tactics of the right, Brock will never believe that negative coverage results from legitimate shortcomings. Instead, it's all personal, all false, and all a war.

This is a bad harbinger for those who had hoped that Hillary would "kill off the wild dogs," as one Obama loyalist put it, and Bill would leave behind the sketchy hangers-on in the mold of Ron Burkle and Jeffrey Epstein.

Hillary's inability to dispense with brass-knuckle, fanatical acolytes like Brock shows that she still has an insecure streak that requires Borgia-like blind loyalty, and can't distinguish between the real vast right-wing conspiracy and the voices of legitimate concern.

Money-grubbing is always the ugly place with the Clintons, who have devoured $2.1 billion in contributions since 1992 to their political campaigns, family foundation and philanthropies, according to The Old (Good) New Republic.

David Axelrod, the author of a new memoir, "Believer," wrote that Hillary's past gurus, Morris and Penn, were nonbelievers — mercenary, manipulative and avaricious. He told Politico's Glenn Thrush that he would have advised Hillary not to cash in with her book and six-figure speeches.

Axelrod reiterated to me that Hillary's designated campaign chairman, John Podesta, Bill Clinton's last chief of staff who left his post as an Obama counselor on Friday, "has the strength and standing to enforce a kind of campaign discipline that hasn't existed before."

But, for now, what Republicans say about government is true of the Clintons: They really do believe that your money belongs to them.

Someday, they should give their tin cup to the Smithsonian. It's one of the wonders of the world.


Share:

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Oceans being polluted with trash at alarming rate

Our forever shame as a species -- that we pollute our planetary home.  We are making Mother Earth completely unlivable.  And where we will go then? 

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/u-s-polluting-ocean-trash-alarming-rate/
Share:

Friday, February 13, 2015

911 Truth in a Nutshell - 6 minute video

Best video yet explaining what happened on 9/11 and why we should, as good Americans, believe what our government tells us.  If you don't, you will be labeled a conspiracy nut.  Watch the very short video and judge for yourself...  Please pass it along for your friends to "enjoy."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xqQdy77mqzU
Share:

Friday, February 06, 2015

Just found this on a friend's Facebook page

and I heartily agree with it.  It's happened to me, too.  The comments in blue below are my friend's:


It's happened, even to me. And believe me, I hang in there until I just can't take it when a friend who keeps making the same mistakes over and over and over again, without trying to make changes, before I give up...maybe not completely, but they'll hear less and less from me when I hit this point.

Share: