Supreme Court Corporate Decision Coming Up

Seems the Republican appointed judges would like to have it both ways. Corporations are real people who can give tons of money to presidential candidates -- but when it comes to liability for human rights violations, well, guess they're not "people" then. Sure smacks of hypocrisy. Could it be the GOP-appointed justices are receiving money for their votes that always favor the corporations?  Hmmmm??? (Do bears like honey?)

On Tuesday morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument on whether corporations, like real people, can be held liable in American courts for international human rights violations.

The issue has divided four appeals courts over the past year and a half, as Democrat-appointed judges have uniformly voted for corporate liability while all but one Republican-appointed judge has come down for corporate immunity.

If that pattern holds in the Supreme Court, then the five justices appointed by Republican presidents will surely be hit with more accusations of pro-business bias: Having all voted in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission to extend to corporations the First Amendment right of actual people to independently spend unlimited sums in this country's elections, they will in the current case have refused to hold corporations responsible, as real people are, for their roles in atrocities abroad.

That kind of application of corporate personhood would be enough to make a casual observer's head explode.   Indeed!  Seems like anything the GOP serves up these days tends to do that to the rest of us.