Wednesday, November 12, 2008

UNPRECEDENTED WARNING ABOUT COD LIVER OIL

I got the following important message in my e-mail today. My mother used to give us cod liver oil every day -- lord only knows how much Vit. A toxicity we kids had. I think most mothers today don't give their kids cod liver oil (what kid today would take that foul-tasting stuff without spitting it out? :-P ), but it's important to know about the Vitamin A warnings.

However, the most important part of this medical doctor's message is that the doctors are now realizing most kids don't get enough Vitamin D -- and are recommending for healthy children 1,000 IU/day for every 25 pounds of body weight! As they say, in some cases this is more than ten times the current recommendations for children by the government and professional organizations.
Finally, the group recommended that "children with chronic illness such as autism, diabetes, and/or frequent infections" may need to take even more vitamin D, "doses adequate to maintain their 25-hydroxy vitamin D in the mid normal of the reference range (65 ng/ml) - and should be so supplemented year around." Less than one percent of American children currently have such levels.

Dangers of cod liver oil

November 11, 2008

Today, sixteen well-known experts, including professors Walter Willett and Ed Giovannucci of Harvard, Dr. John Hathcock of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, and Professor Reinhold Vieth of the University of Toronto, published an unprecedented warning about the ingestion of cod liver oil and resultant vitamin A toxicity.

Cod Liver Oil, Vitamin A Toxicity, Frequent Respiratory Infections, and the Vitamin D Deficiency Epidemic

John J. Cannell, MD; Reinhold Vieth, MS, PhD; Walter Willett, MD, DrPH; Michael Zasloff, MD, PhD; John N. Hathcock, MSc, PhD; John H. White, PhD; Sherry A. Tanumihardjo, MSc, PhD; D. Enette Larson-Meyer, PhD; Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari, MD, MPH; Christel J. Lamberg-Allardt, PhD; Joan M. Lappe, PhD, RN; Anthony W. Norman, PhD; Armin Zittermann, PhD; Susan J. Whiting, MSc, PhD; William B. Grant, PhD; Bruce W. Hollis, PhD; Edward Giovannucci, MD

Using the strongest language published to date, the group condemned the current (1997) Food and Nutrition Board (FNB) recommendations for vitamin D, stating "The 1997 FNB recommendations offend the most basic principles of pharmacology and toxicology, leading us to conclude that the current official guidelines and limitations for vitamin D intakes are scientifically indefensible."

In addition to warning about the consumption of cod liver oil, the above experts recommended healthy children take 1,000 IU/day of vitamin D for every 25 pounds of body weight. In some cases this is more than ten times current recommendations for children by the government and professional organizations.

Finally, the group recommended that "children with chronic illness such as autism, diabetes, and/or frequent infections" may need to take even more vitamin D, "doses adequate to maintain their 25-hydroxy vitamin D in the mid normal of the reference range (65 ng/ml) - and should be so supplemented year around." Less than one percent of American children currently have such levels.

I'm sorry I can't send you this paper. Even though I wrote it, I had to pay to download it and agree not to reproduce it.
John Cannell, MD
Share:

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Barack answers letter from 8-year-old

Click here: Barack Obama responds to eight-year-old girl's advice - ParentDish

Like Abraham Lincoln when he wrote back to the little girl who suggested he grow a beard, thanking her for her suggestion, Barack Obama has written to a little girl who wrote to him.
It's in little things like this that one can get the measure of a man.

How very different from Bush!!! When our Isabella wrote him almost two years ago, it took months for her to get a reply--and then it was just a photo of him and Laura and a form letter, no indication at all that he had ever read her earnest letter.

I'll include Isabella's letter here for comparison, just as I wrote about it 2 years ago:


My little 6-year-old granddaughter Isabella has been listening to the news and asking questions lately like "What is going on with this president, Mommy? What is the matter with him? Doesn't he know people are being killed in this war? Doesn't he care?" One day, out of the blue, she said, "I want to write a letter to President Bush. Daddy, will you listen to what I say and write it down?" So her Dad did exactly that. Here is what she said:

Dear Mr. President,
You don't have to be afraid that somebody will hurt you. Promise you won't kill or hurt anybody and send out the army. Don't be mean. You should be nice. Please stop the war. The golden rule is the most important thing in the world. You are not using the golden rule. You gotta' be nice and caring and not start any wars, because you can get injured. We want to be kindful in this country.

Sincerely,
Isabella Darling (She signed her name and put Age 6 under it)


My daughter Jeanie often reminds her children of the Golden Rule, so it has become important in their world to treat others as they wish to be treated. Isabella insisted the letter be mailed right away and ran to get an envelope for it. They mailed it out that afternoon. That very night there was a report about Bush and the war on TV (as usual)--and Isabella was in the other room. When she heard something about Bush and some words that caught her ear, she ran breathlessly into the room and said, "Is that about my letter? Did he get it and stop the war?" Oh, my dearest little Isabella, if only it were that simple! I call her our little earth angel. Perhaps we will be lucky enough to have her for this country's president one day. (~.~)


Months after sending her letter, she finally received a reply from Bush. It was a form letter (natch) and a large photo of Bush and Laura. Jeanie showed her the letter and at first she was excited about it. Jeanie suggested, "Maybe you could take it for Show and Tell in school tomorrow." Isabella asked, "Did he say he's going to stop the war?" Jeanie said, "No." Isabella then said matter-of-factly, "I don't want to take it to school. I'll take a picture of a Chincoteague pony instead." (She loves Chincoteagues.) :-)




Share:

Monday, November 10, 2008

Obama to undo at least 200 Bush executive orders

Thank heavens, we finally have an intelligent and wise adult at the steering wheel!!! Stem cell research will be funded and environmental programs will take center stage. After 8 years trudging through the desert, we have finally reached an oasis!! (~.~)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/11/08/AR2008110801856.html?hpid%3Dtopnews&sub=new

EXCERPT: Transition advisers to President-elect Barack Obama have compiled a list of about 200 Bush administration actions and executive orders that could be swiftly undone to reverse White House policies on climate change, stem cell research, reproductive rights and other issues, according to congressional Democrats, campaign aides and experts working with the transition team.

Obama himself has signaled, for example, that he intends to reverse Bush's controversial limit on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research, a decision that scientists say has restrained research into some of the most promising avenues for defeating a wide array of diseases, such as Parkinson's.
Share:

The true story of Christine Collins--and the new movie The Changeling

http://movie-openings.blogspot.com/2008/05/legacy-of-mothers-love-christine.html

I saw The Changeling this past weekend. It's a superb film, making you feel you have been transported to 1928 Los Angeles. I highly recommend it.
Share:

What Didn't Palin Know? More important, what have Americans discovered about Republicans?

The following article from USA Today makes the important point that whether or not the allegations by the McCain camp against Palin are true, something is very wrong with the way Republicans conduct their business. Either Palin is incredibly ignorant, or McCain (who has made no attempt to admonish or pull back his campaign aides in their anonymous sleaze attack against Palin) made a huge mistake in naming her as his running mate. Or both.

Either way, most thinking Americans have lost faith in the Republican party to make decisions for our country. Republicans appear to know only one way to make their case: ATTACK, ATTACK, ATTACK whomever is perceived as the enemy at any moment in time. In this case, the McCain camp's enemy seems to be Sarah Palin, whose own attack tactics against Obama didn't work.

Whatever the truth is in the McCain/Palin fight now taking place, the Republican party's main members are giving us all a privileged glimpse into the obvious. Even among themselves, they are unable to be civil or learn to compromise. The "blame game" is the only one they know how to play. "Empathy," "understanding," and "mutual concession" are words not included in their operational lexicon. Because of this monumental failing in their philosophy and actions, they will never be the party to bring about global peace and brotherhood. Not unless they change at their base. (Don't count on that happening any time soon.)

However, the number of long-time Republican supporters, on whom McCain and Palin based their hopes, is beginning to dwindle, as more intelligent GOP voters move from the right to the center, and even to the left. The Rush Limbaughs, Ann Coulters, and Bill O'Reillys are losing their grip on their "ditto heads" and are becoming even more shrill in their blistering attacks on Obama, who has not yet even taken office. They are unwilling to support any leadership other than their own, which we have seen by the last eight years, has proven to be a colossal failure.

The too prideful Republican "base" members do not realize they are on the wrong track, politically and philosophically--and, worst of all, they are unwilling to look at themselves introspectively, admit their failings, and change. They will not support Obama's platform of "change" because that word is foreign to them. Filled with fear at the very mention of "change," they want to cling to the old ways they know, even though those ways of fear, blame, and attack have proven, over and over, not to work. They believe, as did Hitler, that if you tell a lie that is big enough, often enough, most of the people will believe it and follow you. Americans have shown by their votes in this last election that the majority of our citizens are too smart to fall for the big lies forever. When the public discovers the big lies were exactly that, they will desert the liars in droves. And that is exactly what has happened.


Read full article at: http://blogs.usatoday.com/oped/2008/11/what-didnt-pali.html

EXCERPT:

If Palin truly has a stupendous ignorance of international geography, it reinforces doubts about her suitability for high national office, this year and in the future. And the reported shopping sprees, if confirmed, reflect a worrisome sense of entitlement for a public official.

If false or distorted, however, the attacks reflect malicious smears by people McCain entrusted to help run his campaign.

Either way, taking shots at someone from the safety of anonymity reflects badly not just on the supposedly loyal aides who leveled the criticism, but on McCain, who seemed unable or unwilling to restrain them. If the point is to blame Palin for the campaign's failures, it's also a reminder that the aides who recommended her did McCain no service, and the candidate miscalculated when he picked her.

Share:

After 8 long years, we are finally returning to our REAL Values!

It Still Felt Good the Morning After
by Frank Rich, NY Times

EXCERPT: The post-Bush-Rove Republican Party is in the minority because it has driven away women, the young, suburbanites, black Americans, Latino-Americans, Asian-Americans, educated Americans, gay Americans and, increasingly, working-class Americans. Who’s left? The only states where the G.O.P. increased its percentage of the presidential vote relative to the Democrats were West Virginia, Tennessee, Louisiana and Arkansas. Even the North Carolina county where Palin expressed her delight at being in the “real America” went for Obama by more than 18 percentage points.

The actual real America is everywhere. It is the America that has been in shell shock since the aftermath of 9/11, when our government wielded a brutal attack by terrorists as a club to ratchet up our fears, betray our deepest constitutional values and turn Americans against one another in the name of “patriotism.” What we started to remember the morning after Election Day was what we had forgotten over the past eight years, as our abusive relationship with the Bush administration and its press enablers dragged on: That’s not who we are.

So even as we celebrated our first black president, we looked around and rediscovered the nation that had elected him. “We are the ones we’ve been waiting for,” Obama said in February, and indeed millions of such Americans were here all along, waiting for a leader. This was the week that they reclaimed their country.

Read full column at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/opinion/09rich.html?_r=1&em&oref=slogin

Share:

First Bush-Obama Meeting: Hard Feelings and Hand Sanitizer (!)

EXCERPT: The president added with a bit of a scowl: "He doesn't know me very well." On the contrary, Mr. Bush, I'd say Obama got your number very accurately on that first visit!
Obama wrote. "The president's eyes became fixed; his voice took on the agitated, rapid tone of someone neither accustomed to nor welcoming interruption; his easy affability was replaced by an almost messianic certainty. As I watched my mostly Republican Senate colleagues hang on his every word, I was reminded of the dangerous isolation that power can bring, and appreciated the Founders' wisdom in designating a system to keep power in check."

First Bush-Obama Meeting: Hard Feelings and Hand Sanitizer

As President Bush and President-elect Barack Obama prepare for their post-election meeting at the White House on Monday, memories of their first encounter linger.

President Bush and President-elect Barack Obama are probably hoping their meeting Monday goes better than their first get-together, which left a bad taste in the mouths of both men.

Four years ago, Obama and other newly elected members of the Senate were invited to the White House for a breakfast meeting with Bush, who pulled the young Chicagoan aside.

"Obama!" Bush exclaimed, according to Obama's account of the meeting in his second memoir, "The Audacity of Hope." "Come here and meet Laura. Laura, you remember Obama. We saw him on TV during election night. Beautiful family. And that wife of yours -- that's one impressive lady."

The two men shook hands and then, according to Obama, Bush turned to an aide, "who squirted a big dollop of hand sanitizer in the president's hand."

Bush then offered some to Obama, who recalled: "Not wanting to seem unhygienic, I took a squirt."

The president then led Obama off to one side of the room, where Bush said: "I hope you don't mind me giving you a piece of advice."

"Not at all, Mr. President," Obama told the commander-in-chief.

"You've got a bright future," Bush said presciently. "Very bright. But I've been in this town awhile and, let me tell you, it can be tough. When you get a lot of attention like you've been getting, people start gunnin' for ya. And it won't necessarily just be coming from my side, you understand. From yours, too. Everybody'll be waiting for you to slip, know what I mean? So watch yourself."

Bush then noted that he and Obama had something in common.

"We both had to debate Alan Keyes," the president said. "That guy's a piece of work, isn't he?"

Obama laughed and even "put my arm around his shoulder as we talked," he recalled, although he added the gesture "might have made many of my friends, not to mention the Secret Service agents in the room, more than a little uneasy."

Despite this display of bonhomie, Obama said the president's demeanor turned downright frightening when he laid out his agenda to the freshly minted lawmakers.

"Suddenly it felt as if somebody in a back room had flipped a switch," Obama wrote. "The president's eyes became fixed; his voice took on the agitated, rapid tone of someone neither accustomed to nor welcoming interruption; his easy affability was replaced by an almost messianic certainty. As I watched my mostly Republican Senate colleagues hang on his every word, I was reminded of the dangerous isolation that power can bring, and appreciated the Founders' wisdom in designating a system to keep power in check."

When I quoted from this passage to Bush during an Oval Office interview, the president seemed irritated to learn he had been taken to task by the senator he once counseled.

I thought I was actually showing some kindness," Bush said indignantly. "And out of that he came with this belief?"

The president added with a bit of a scowl: "He doesn't know me very well."


Share:

Saturday, November 08, 2008

Al Franken might not be so dismissive of election fraud now

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/18549
sometimes truth just has to hit home before it will be heard and acknowledged...
Share:

The Disappearing Male?

Studies show rise in birth defects, infertility among males

Read: http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/news/story.html?id=f

Chemtrails aren't mentioned -- but I wonder what effect they are having on culling the human herd...and is that their purpose?
Share:

91% of Republicans like Sarah -- 64% want her to run in 2012

OMG! No wonder the Republican party is imploding. Sarah didn't even know Africa is a continent -- yet the Republicans railed against Obama as being "inexperienced." I guess they don't think of "uneducated" or "ignorant" as hindrances for application to the highest office in the land. That's already been demonstrated by their choice of Bush--TWICE. What is the matter with these people? Have their brains stopped working?

I know several Republicans, but am hopeful they are not within the 64% who actually think Sarah Palin is qualified to be president. There have to be SOME smart Republicans still left in the nation. Perhaps they, like Colin Powell, have deserted the Republican party where much of the membership doesn't believe in evolution and thinks dinosaurs and humans were on the earth at the same time -- 4,000 years ago. If the Democrats started spouting stuff like this--and bringing in candidates of the Sarah Palin type, I'd be out of that party in blink-your-eyes time.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/07/poll-64-percent-of-republ_n_142284.html
Share:

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Stepping into the Sunshine

Beautiful!

Stepping into the Sunshine
by Eugene Robinson

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/11/stepping_into_the_sunshine.html
Share:

The truth about Sarah Palin is coming out now -- from McCain's campaign!

Seeing Bill O'Reilly's face on FOX News listening to Carl Cameron's relating of the full Sarah Palin story, as it unfolded behind the scenes in the McCain campaign: PRICELESS!

See video at:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/05/palin-didnt-know-africa-i_n_141653.html
Share:

My feelings, exactly

What a Relief - America Survives
By Cenk Uygur

I figured out why I was so relieved last night. It's because I have spent the last six years (that's when I realized how radical the Bush administration was) on pins and needles that we were going to lose America and do tremendous damage to the world. Bush could do something monumentally wrong at any moment. But even more important was that Cheney had so degraded the American system of government that for the first time in my life, I wondered if the idea of America would survive.

Would they fix the elections? Would they make up some fake emergency to stay in power? Would they find some nefarious way to make sure John McCain won the elections? Did the powers-that-be secretly control these things? Was our democracy real? These are all thoughts I would not have entertained eight years ago. I would have found them laughable. But after seeing what Cheney and Bush were willing to do in the last eight years, it seemed that nothing was beyond them.

But it didn't happen. What tremendous relief! And joy. America survives!

As Obama said in his victory speech, it's okay to dream again. For the rest of the world to believe again. The beacon of light is back. The shining city on the hill is back. We sent a loud and clear message to the rest of the world - you are all Americans again.

We docked the ship on shore. We're back to normal now. We can have our fights about domestic policy. We can disagree slightly on foreign policy. We can go back and forth on all the issues. But the Constitution stands. Some crazy neo-cons won't convince an idiot president to start another reckless war. And we can all sleep well at night again.

The idea of a health care debate sounds so lovely to me. We have habeas corpus back. We have re-established the fundamental building blocks of Western civilization. We have our foundation underneath us. Now, let's go forward and fight, argue and disagree -- and be the country I know and love again.

America has come back home.

Share:

Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Election Anxiety: Advice from Abraham Lincoln

The following essay gives excellent advice and inspiration. From the very beginning of Obama's pursuit of the presidency, I have been observing how like Lincoln he is--even in his tall and thin physical form. He started his campaign from the steps of the state capitol in Springfield, Illinois, just as Lincoln did -- and he has refused to participate in the politics of negativity and insults, even while being attacked by the dirtiest of Karl Rove-type politics. Obama does not encourage negativity in his supporters, but has always taken the high road throughout the campaign. "Hope" and "change" are his watchwords, and he has never deviated from them. Lincoln's ability to inspire and encourage with his speeches is well known, and his words have been revered through the ages. They are still inspiring us today. He was able to communicate sincerely, honestly, and humbly with the common man, probably because he had come from the same common roots as they. Obama's speeches are also inspirational, perhaps not to the same degree as Lincoln's--yet. But he has the same magic "something" that Lincoln had, that reaches into the hearts of his listeners and motivates them to have hope, even in times of desperation.

Believing in reincarnation as I do, I have even entertained the thought that perhaps Obama is a new incarnation of Lincoln. Wouldn't it be appropriate for the man who spoke always of uniting the country, the "Great Emancipator" of African-Americans, to choose a new incarnation as half-black, half-white in order to finish the reconciliation of the races -- and ascend to the presidency once more--this time in the form of a black man? Lincoln was not able to finish the job he started in the Civil War days. His life was cut short by the madness of John Wilkes Booth, and he was not able to soothe or reason with the inflamed southern hatred that remained after the war. He was not given the chance to bring the country through a period of reconstruction and reconciliation as he had hoped. Instead of his dream of bringing a divided nation together, the discord between the north and south has continued down through the years of American history, to the present day. Despite the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the advances made by African Americans since then, there is still much racial divide in our nation. By signing the Civil Rights Act into law, Lyndon Johnson seemed to be carrying out the duties that should have been performed by Andrew Johnson when he ascended to the presidency after Lincoln's death. (I've always found it interesting that both men's names were Johnson. To carry the reincarnational theory one step further, might not the soul of Andrew Johnson have returned to correct some of its mistakes of the past?)

Whether or not you can contemplate or agree with these reincarnational musings, I think you will find the Lincoln quotes in the following essay to be inspirational. Perhaps you will wish, as the author does--and I do, that our new president will embody some of Lincoln's finest characteristics and will bring fulfillment to many of his hopes and dreams for our country. My own highest hope is that Obama will be able to heal the divides that now exist, and bring our country together. It is a huge task that lies before him, and (regardless of our political persuasion) he deserves our best wishes and prayers as he takes up the heavy burden of the presidency in the year 2009.

Election Anxiety: Advice from Abraham Lincoln

by Russell Bishop

By the time the votes are tabulated and our choice for President is confirmed, we will find ourselves standing at a critical fork in the road, one that leads either to a precipice from which we leap to our own demise, or toward a towering mountain beyond which lies a verdant field of promise. The choice will be yours, mine and our neighbors.

As I found myself concerned about this election and its implications, I turned to Abraham Lincoln for inspiration. Most of us know that Lincoln was a Republican, one who guided us from a troubling past of slavery into a future that seems very much upon us. His guidance from the past seems ever current today.

Please consider these eloquent words and join in creating a future in which we can all grow and prosper.

On the need to unite

"With Malice toward none, with charity for all, with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in, to bind up the nation's wounds."

"A house divided against itself cannot stand."

As we move forward from the election, uniting for the common good will be critical, both for the well being of us as individuals, and more so for the well being of the country. Clearly, we need to support one another, to comfort one another, and to align ourselves in the restoration of good works from which and for which all will benefit.

"Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them?"

Surely, neither the McCain nor Obama camps are trying to do harm to the nation, the people or to the world at large. They clearly disagree mightily about the right and proper course. Can we not find a way to align in service to the common good, to respectfully disagree, and address the negatives of the world without having to add negativity in the process? We need to step past the animus, the name calling, and join together to improve this country and well being of ALL of our citizens.

"How many legs does a dog have if you call the tail a leg? Four. Calling a tail a leg doesn't make it a leg."

Could we please stop the insults, the outrageous accusations, and outright lies? Just today I watched an interview of voters in Texas proclaiming Barack Obama to be a socialist, a Muslim, and a friend of terrorists. Even worse, robocalls are circulating today in Pennsylvania accusing Barack of activities basically supporting domestic terrorism. Could we please stop circulating this kind of trash talk? Even if you think Barack Obama or John McCain is a "dog," at least let us be clear that he is of the four legged variety.

And in case you don't like someone from the other side, consider this advice from President Lincoln::

"I don't like that man. I must get to know him better. "

I sure hope everyone is listening! Could you be the person others dislike? Are you someone else's "jerk." I am not a fan of John McCain the politician; however, I have no doubt that he is a fine human being, one who cares and cares deeply. I can easily disagree with his approach without having to villify him.

I once commented that very few parents spend late night hours trying to figure out how to screw up their kids, despite what their kids may have to say about them. The same is true for both the McCain and Obama camps - no matter what you think of their politics or policies, neither is spending any time whatsoever trying to make things worse.

On America as leader in the free world:

"Allow the president to invade a neighboring nation, whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion, and you allow him to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such a purpose - and you allow him to make war at pleasure. "

"My dream is of a place and a time where America will once again be seen as the last best hope of earth."

I sure hope we are listening here. We have seen enough of self-serving excuses to use war as an economic tool or the lever to force upon others that which we deem to be in their best interest. Could we please lead by example rather than force? Protection and defense are one thing, aggression based on deception is quite another.

As we move forward from this election, I sincerely hope our new President shares Lincoln's dream and will craft policies intended to inspire, to lead, and to ensure equall treatment for all.

On fixing the current political, social and financial crisis:

"Give me six hours to chop down a tree and I will spend the first four sharpening the axe."

Don't we need to spend a few hours figuring out how to fix the current mess without rushing into ill conceived "plans" that can be usurped as easily as the plans that created the current mess?

"Republicans are for both the man and the dollar, but in case of conflict the man before the dollar."

Knowing that Lincoln was a Republican, you have to wonder if and how things could have changed so much. Can we find our way back to valuing people more highly than financial gain?

"I am a firm believer in the people. If given the truth, they can be depended upon to meet any national crisis. The great point is to bring them the real facts."

"You cannot escape the responsibility of tomorrow by evading it today "

Every politician I have heard in the last couple of decades waxes poetic, with a bit of fire and brimstone thrown in when talking about mortgaging our future and shackling our children's children with insurmountable debt and financial problems. And then they seem to heap more kindling on the fire. Hopefully, our new President will heed Mr. Lincoln's advice and lead us into a new era of response-ability, accountability, and integrity. Please!

On leading us into the future:

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."

Could whomever wins office tomorrow have the courage and character to address that which is for the common good, to look after the many rather than the few, and restore a sense of dignity and pride to who we are as a nation?

"He has a right to criticize, who has a heart to help."

Nearly one hundred years later, Sidney J. Harris said: "If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem."

May we all have wisdom to unite, the courage to face the future, and the heart to help.

Share:

Monday, November 03, 2008

Rachel Maddow: A Very Wise Woman

Rachel is my favorite commentator--bar none! MSNBC is lucky to have her, and I think they know it! (~.~) She is genuinely humble, even though being the most intelligent person on any channel anywhere. She is kind, even to Pat Buchanan (a regular visitor on her show), but does not give an inch from her own beliefs. And she expresses herself so articulately! She is a pleasure to watch and to listen to. As one of the people in the article said, "She is more like one of my friends than anyone else on television." That is how I feel about Rachel. You know that old query, "If you could have anyone in the world, past or present, at your dinner party, who would you choose?" Well, Rachel Maddow would be on my A list, right at the top, along with Jesus Christ, Buddha, Abraham Lincoln, Mark Twain, Will Rogers, Shakespeare, and Sri Atmananda Krishna Menon of Trivandrum (biography and philosophy at: http://www.geocities.com/skknair_tvm/philo.htm). Wow, that would be some party--destined to go well into the night and even the next day!

Here is the latest article on Rachel from the New York Magazine:

http://nymag.com/news/media/51822/
Share:

The Platform of the 1840 Know-Nothings Is Still With Us Today

The New Know-Nothings: Sarah Palin Reveals the GOP As It Really Is
By Larry Beinhart
November 3, 2008

It was Jesus Christ, if Matthew is to be believed, who said, "Love thine enemy." It is in that spirit that I write this belated valentine to Sarah Palin.

Sarah, I love you for having revealed unto the media the snarling heart of the beast that is the base (and the soul) of the Republican Party. Yes, you have the lipstick and the heels, not to mention the calves and bosoms, that send Republican men into swoons, but you have more; the pit-bull snarl that rouses your supporters to cry out, "Traitor!" against Obama, and "Kill him!"

George Bush kept those folks in their kennels, ran as a "compassionate conservative," and always masked his most heinous plans in double speak. Bush the Elder, Ronald Reagan, and even Richard Nixon never explicitly ran on hate and fear of "the other." They used words that were coded enough that it was possible to pretend that they were true.

But now the beast is loose.

The Republican Party likes to remember Abraham Lincoln. And so they should. It's a nice memory and brings credit to them. As does the accidental ascension of Teddy Roosevelt, environmentalist and basher of corporations. Back in the 1950s and '60s, their party included such figures as Dwight Eisenhower -- whose reputation grows ever better in retrospect -- Nelson Rockefeller, who built New York's state university system, and New York City mayor John Lindsey.

But there is another strand that runs through their history.

Back in the 1840s, there was a group called the Know Nothings. They were against immigrants and for real Americans. ("Real American" did not then, as it does not now, refer to Indians; it refers to descendants of English immigrants.) The movement was based on fear. Irish and German Catholics were going to take over. They would take orders from the Pope-in-Rome (one word). Their values were not "our values." They drank. Their nunneries were virtual brothels and when the nuns had babies they practiced infanticide.

The Know Nothings started with secret societies like the Order of the Star Spangled Banner, associated with William Poole, better known as Bill the Butcher, depicted by Daniel Day Lewis in Gangs of New York. Their public political face was the American Republican Party, which became the Native American Party, and finally the American Party.

Their platform was:

  • Severe limits on immigration, especially from Catholic countries.
  • Restricting political office to "native-born" Americans.
  • Mandating a wait of 21 years before an immigrant could gain citizenship.
  • Restricting public school teaching to Protestants.
  • Mandating daily Bible readings in public schools (from the Protestant version of the Bible).
  • Restricting the sale of liquor.

For a brief time, the American Party was wildly popular. In 1854 party membership swelled from 50,000 to over a million in a matter of months. It elected mayors in Philadelphia, Boston, Washington, DC, San Francisco, and Chicago, and won the state legislature and governorship of Massachusetts.

But there were other things going on: the Mexican War, slavery, secession, and the Civil War. The movement didn't last long and was soon absorbed by the Republican Party.

Fair is fair. Things morph and change. The Republican Party freed the slaves and tried to create an interracial democratic South during Reconstruction. The Democratic Party became the party of segregation in the South and the second home of the Klu Klux Klan. To be Republican is not to be necessarily narrow-minded and in dread fear of foreigners. To be Democratic is not necessarily to be liberal, progressive and open-minded.

But enough of being fair.

The Great Depression demonstrated that the principles of the Republican Party were bankrupt. Like most of the country. The Democrats became the progressive party, representing social justice and programs that would protect capitalism from its own worst tendencies, moving toward a vision of a perfectable world. The Republicans became -- in a very literal sense -- a reactionary party, reacting against whatever the Democrats were doing, engaged in a 60-year-long war against the New Deal.

Lyndon Johnson is the pivotal figure, both heroic and deeply tragic. The Democratic Party's dirty public secret was that its political hegemony rested on the Solid South, still refusing to vote Republican out of hatred of Lincoln. Johnson knew that if he pushed through the Civil Rights Act his party would lose the South for a generation. Or more. His heroism is that he did anyway. No, he did not end the race issue, but he broke the back of segregation.

The Republicans saw their opportunity. They pursued the Southern Strategy, wooing resentful whites with great success.

But two things happened.

Racism became less and less tenable. The generation that cherished it has grown old. That pillar of the Republican Party is crumbling.

And then along came Bush-Cheney. Like Herbert Hoover, in the process of leading the country to bankruptcy they demonstrated that the Republican Party's ideas were also bankrupt. They made government bigger, not smaller -- and more intrusive, too. They didn't oppose special interests, they were the special interests. They didn't oppose lobbyists, they forced lobbyists to join their party at fiscal gunpoint. They were militaristic on parade, but could not run a war. They could not protect the country nor punish the people who actually attacked us. Their policies demonstrated that free markets are a fiction, and real markets need more supervision than a grade-school playground.

Along came John McCain. He looked out, from sea to shining sea, from the mountains, to the prairies, in search of voters who would vote for him. All he could find were the new Know Nothings. People who, frightened of the way things are changing, want to change back to that white, Protestant place it was, oh, sometime back before 1840. America Firsters. Anti-immigrant. Anti-foreigner. Anti-elite. Anti-intelligence.

Not quite capable of running as a true Know Nothing himself, he chose someone who could: Sarah Palin. She does it well, and in so doing, shows us, clearly and simply, who they really are.
_______
Share:

Sunday, November 02, 2008

A North Carolina friend wrote of her experiences

She has been politically active in that state -- and is excited about the possibility of it becoming a blue state. She wrote a blog about her canvassing activities in Durham. Go, Teala! (~.~) You can read her blog at:

http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/tealas

I did canvassing today.. wow, that was an experience. . . . The last set of statistics for NC early voting were 2.3 million votes already cast, and that is about 67% of *all* the votes cast in NC for the 2004 election. In NC this is bound to be a record election turnout. I really hope we can swing this state blue!
Share:

Bush: "What's the G20?"

Well, given the past idiotic gaffes by Bush, the following one is not hard to believe! Sarah Palin is the female equivalent of George Bush, and we are VERY fortunate that she won't have a place in the new White House in January 2009. After an 8-year journey through dark and hellish neocon waters, we will once again have someone intelligent at the helm of our ship of state.


SYDNEY (AFP) – Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd came under fire on Sunday for reportedly leaking embarrassing details of a phone call with US President George W. Bush.
During the call to discuss the global financial crisis on October 10, Bush reportedly responded to a suggestion by Rudd for a summit of the G20 group by saying: "What's the G20?"

The alleged exchange, reported by The Weekend Australian to have taken place as Rudd took the call during a dinner party at his official Sydney residence, has been denied by both Washington and Rudd's office.
But the leader of the opposition Liberal Party, Malcolm Turnbull, said Sunday that Rudd should apologise for embarrassing Bush by leaking details of the phone call.
The alleged exchange was leaked "in a way that was clearly authoritative, that clearly came from the prime minister's office," Turnbull said.
The briefing was "designed to embarrass the US, and in particular the president, and of course to make Mr Rudd particularly knowledgeable," Turnbull said.

The G20, a grouping of the world's largest industrialised and emerging economies, will meet in Washington on November 15, at Bush's invitation, to discuss the financial crisis.
Former foreign minister Alexander Downer, who served the Liberal government ousted by Rudd's Labor Party last year, called for an investigation into the alleged leak, saying it could damage Australia's ties with the US.
Turnbull said Rudd could avoid a police investigation by apologising for the "remarkable diplomatic gaffe," saying he had heard directly that the leak had caused offence to the Bush administration.
"This has caused considerable offence in Washington," he said.

The Sunday Telegraph reported that Rudd's office had issued a statement denying the alleged details of the conversation.
"The president did not make the reported comment you refer to. In fact he has been deeply engaged with the G20 and the role the G20 will play in dealing with the global financial crisis," the statement said.
Rudd is expected to attend the G20 summit in Washington.
Share: