Saturday, February 12, 2011

Huge numbers of Americans don't realize they receive government social programs

So sadly true, and these people vote (blindly, but they vote):  In this case, we get many beneficiaries of government services actually cheering on cuts to their own benefits, not because they are ideologically against government -- but because they don't even think they get those benefits, when in fact they do. It's beyond the ignorance of not knowing that Medicare is a government program a la the fool who screamed "keep your government hands off my Medicare" -- it's not even knowing you are the beneficiaries of the policies you say you hate. Beyond any single issue, that kind of aggressive stupidity is the true crisis in America.

IDIOCRACY by the Numbers: New Data Show Many Americans Have No Idea They Receive Government Benefits
by David Sirota

How aggressively stupid is America when it comes to our debates over taxes, budgets and the size of government? That's been difficult to answer with any precision, beyond simply citing the Tea Partier who famously told his congressman to "keep your government hands off my Medicare." But now we have some hard numbers to tell us how deep this ignorance really goes.

According to new data crunched by Cornell University's Suzanne Mettler, large numbers of Americans who receive benefits from government social programs nonetheless tell pollsters they "have not used a government social program." And when I mean large, I mean large. For example, a majority of those who have received federally subsidized student loans, 44 percent of Social Security beneficiaries and 40 percent of G.I. bill recipients say they have not used a government social program.

These numbers go a long way to explaining why the economic debate in our country is so insane. Indeed, at a moment when taxes have hit a historic low, most politicians -- from presidents to governors to state legislators -- insist we must further cut taxes and shrink allegedly "Big Government." And they are finding a receptive audience in the general public because, as the numbers show, so many Americans wrongly believe they don't receive direct financial benefits from government.

Obviously, this aggressive stupidity politically props up the arguments of the anti-government right. With so many Americans evidently not knowing they receive benefits from the government, it's easy for opportunistic politicians to seize on our "me-first, screw everybody else" culture and misleadingly deride the government as some distant entity that exclusively benefits the "other." And if you don't know that, in fact, you are "the other," then you are more likely to conclude that that opportunistic politician is correct, and more likely to cheer on that opportunistic politician as he/she slashes the programs you directly rely on.

This, of course, is what Idiocracy looks like in practice -- a nation whose politics is inspired by "greed is good" self-interest, but whose voters often don't even know what "self-interest" actually is. In this case, we get many beneficiaries of government services actually cheering on cuts to their own benefits, not because they are ideologically against government -- but because they don't even think they get those benefits, when in fact they do. It's beyond the ignorance of not knowing that Medicare is a government program a la the fool who screamed "keep your government hands off my Medicare" -- it's not even knowing you are the beneficiaries of the policies you say you hate.

Beyond any single issue, that kind of aggressive stupidity is the true crisis in America.
Share:

Teens, young adults sniffing bath salts now -- with dire consequences

I just heard about this latest craze the other day from a friend -- here's an article about it, for those who have teens and young adults in their lives (children or grandchildren):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/howard-meitiner/bath-salts-new-drug-old-problem-_b_818955.html

EXCERPT:

Recently, there's been a lot of buzz about "bath salts," the newest over-the-counter item teens are using to get high. The synthetic powder -- sold legally online and in drug paraphernalia stores under such names as "Ivory Wave" and "Purple Wave" -- has been linked to an alarming number of ER visits across the country. Although we are less than two months into 2011, the American Association of Poison Control Centers has fielded more calls about "bath salts" overdoses than in all of last year.

"Bath salts" may look innocent, but their effects are powerful. According to ONDCP Director Gil Kerlikowske's office, bath salts mimic the effects of cocaine and LSD, causing extreme paranoia and delusions, hallucinations, and suicidal thoughts, among other symptoms. Furthermore, an overdose on "bath salts" can have tragic consequences, as was the case with 21-year-old Dickie Sanders. Dickie snorted a packet of Cloud 9 "bath salts" and was overcome by terror and delirium -- he killed himself that same night.

Share:

Important medical news for anyone taking statins to reduce cholesterol

Take CoQ 10 supplements, too!  In a video interview (and online article if you don't want to watch the video), Dr. Duane Graveline, a family doctor with 23 years experience and a former astronaut, discusses the health implications of cholesterol, statin drugs, and coenzyme Q10. 

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/02/12/dr-duane-graveline-on-cholesterol-and-coq10.aspx

Dr. Graveline has an interesting background that makes him particularly suited to speak on the topic of statin drugs. He's a medical doctor with 23 years of experience whose health was seriously damaged by a statin drug. His personal questions brought him out of retirement to investigate statins, which he's been doing for the past 10 years.

As a former astronaut, he would get annual physicals at the Johnson Space Center in Houston. In 1999 his cholesterol hit 280 and he was given a prescription for Lipitor.

"When they suggested Lipitor (10 mg), I went along with it because I had no reason to be particularly worried about statin drugs," he says. "I had used it a year or so before my retirement, but I wasn't a big user."

However, it quickly became apparent that something was seriously wrong.  For rest of story, go to:  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/02/12/dr-duane-graveline-on-cholesterol-and-coq10.

It's now clear that if you take statin drugs without taking CoQ10, your health is at serious risk as statin drugs deplete your body of this essential co-enzyme. As your body gets more and more depleted of CoQ10, you may suffer from fatigue, muscle weakness and soreness, and eventually heart failure. Coenzyme Q10 is also very important in the process of neutralizing free radicals.

So when your CoQ10 is depleted, you enter a vicious cycle of increased free radicals, loss of cellular energy, and damaged mitochondrial DNA.

Unfortunately, the majority of people who take statins are unaware of their need for CoQ10, and physicians rarely advise their patients to take this supplement along with their statin—at least in the United States. It's also important to supplement right from the start. According to Dr. Graveline, once the mitochondrial damage and mutations are formed they cannot be reversed—no matter how much CoQ10 you take.

So early intervention is key. (Dr. Graveline goes into further detail of how CoQ10 offers protection against mitochondrial DNA damage in this interview, so for more information, please listen to it in its entirety.) If you decide to take a CoQ10 supplement and are over the age of 40, it's important to choose the reduced version, called ubiquinol.

Ubiquinol is a FAR more effective form—I personally take 1-3 a day as it has far-ranging health benefits. Dr. Graveline concurs with this recommendation.

As for dosage, Dr. Graveline makes the following recommendation:

  • If you have symptoms of statin damage such as muscle pain, take anywhere from 200 to 500 mg
  • If you just want to use it preventively, 200 mg or less should be sufficient

There's also evidence that CoQ10/ubiquinol is beneficial for Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease, and even cancer, and that large doses may be justified in those cases as well.

In addition, CoQ10 is believed to play an important role in preventing premature aging in general by preventing telomere shortening, which can slow or potentially even reverse the aging process. This is just one of the additional benefits of CoQ10, and one of the reasons why I take ubiquinol daily even though I've never been on a statin drug.

There are no reported side effects of CoQ10 supplementation, and neither I nor Dr. Graveline have ever heard of anyone overdosing on it. The only drawback is cost.

However, if you're taking ubiquinol, here's some cost-saving information for you.

Certified reduced ubiquinol is only manufactured by one company in the entire world, a Japanese company called Kaneca. They own the patent. So, as long as it's certified ubiquinol, you can buy the cheapest brand you can find, because they're all the same.


Share:

Friday, February 11, 2011

Beautiful ballet dancing/chereography, Romeo and Juliet

danced by Suzanne Farrell, one of the world's most famous ballerinas.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k997fqkXyoo

A good way to add some beauty to your day -- watch this short video.

Share:

FOX News insider tells what most of us know: Their "news" is made up

The only ones who will be surprised by this (and won't believe it, of course!) are those who have been thoroughly indoctrinated by FOX to believe that everything they say is true.  It all comes down from Rupert Murdoch and his philosophy of life.  Most of it is just pure Bullshit.

FOX INSIDER: STUFF IS JUST MADE UP
By  Eric Boehlert

http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/eric-boehlert/34312/fox-news-insider-stuff-is-just-made-up

EXCERPT: Asked what most viewers and observers of Fox News would be surprised to learn about the controversial cable channel, a former insider from the world of Rupert Murdoch was quick with a response: “I don’t think people would believe it’s as concocted as it is; that stuff is just made up.”

Indeed, a former Fox News employee who recently agreed to talk with Media Matters confirmed what critics have been saying for years about Murdoch’s cable channel. Namely, that Fox News is run as a purely partisan operation, virtually every news story is actively spun by the staff, its primary goal is to prop up Republicans and knock down Democrats, and that staffers at Fox News routinely operate without the slightest regard for fairness or fact checking.

“It is their M.O. to undermine the administration and to undermine Democrats,” says the source. “They’re a propaganda outfit but they call themselves news.”

And that’s the word from inside Fox News.

So, Fox News as a legitimate news outlet? The source laughs at the suggestion, and thinks much of the public, along with the Beltway press corps, has been duped by Murdoch’s marketing campaign over the years. “People assume you need a license to call yourself a news channel. You don’t. So because they call themselves Fox News, people probably give them a pass on a lot of things,” says the source.

The source continues: “I don’t think people understand that it’s an organization that’s built and functions by intimidation and bullying, and its goal is to prop up and support Republicans and the GOP and to knock down Democrats. People tend to think that stuff that’s on TV is real, especially under the guise of news. You’d think that people would wise up, but they don’t.”


Share:

GOOD NEWS: Religion losing young people -- hopefully real spirituality is gaining them

RELIGION IS EVOLVING BEFORE OUR EYES
By Paul Pardi
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-pardi/religion-evolved_b_820748.html

EXCERPT:
The face of religion in the United States is changing dramatically. Formal religion is constantly evolving but every so often there is a mutation, or set of mutations, so great that a new species is formed. I believe we're at the cusp of one of those changes.

This seismic shift is not going unnoticed. Distinguished theologian Stanley Hauerwas in an article for ABC titled, "America's God is Dying" concludes with an air of doom, "Put as directly as I can, I believe we may be living at a time when we are watching Protestantism, at least the kind of Protestantism we have in America, come to an end." Recently, Christian Evangelical leader Jim Wallis claimed in a CNN article that the Religious Right "is over" because they no longer are able to attract the younger generation. Michael Spencer opened a recent Christian Science Monitor article with the words, "We are on the verge -- within 10 years -- of a major collapse of evangelical Christianity."

I think the collapse of the kind of "holier-than-thou" Christianity now being practiced by millions in our world today would not be a bad thing.  In fact, I think the collapse of religions of all kinds, that purport to have the "only truth", creating divisions between people, would be a good thing.  Jerry Wilson, a newspaper columnist in Indianapolis, Indiana, wrote a column in 2005, which tells the difference between religion and spirituality quite well.  Following is what he has to say, and I agree with him that Spirituality can bring people together; religion often tears people apart:

Religion vs Spirituality

Some people need religion. Others don’t.

One problem I’ve always had with religion is that the various religions and denominations of religions have become “mega-cliques.” Those who need religion and have chosen one tend to think everybody needs it, and that their chosen religion is the right one.

But religion is not a one-size-fits-all garment. Not everyone’s needs are the same, and those disparate needs cannot all be met by the same religion. That’s probably why there are so many.

I have recently had sort of an epiphany with regards to religion and God. No, God didn’t “speak” to me as others have claimed. And I didn’t run into a burning bush or get struck by lightning.

I contemplate a lot about religion. And there are a few things I’ve figured out. For one thing, I think the world, as a whole, would be better off today if religion had never existed.

Granted, religion provides a lot of comfort and hope for a huge number of people. So it can’t be all bad. People need comfort and hope. Some also need the social aspects of religion – meeting in church each Sunday morning and attending other church-related social events.

But if socializing were all religion was about, there are other ways to accomplish the same thing. What people really need is not religion, but spirituality. There is a difference.

Spirituality can also provide comfort and hope. Spirituality can bring people together; religion often tears people apart. Did God really intend to be the cause of more wars and loss of life than any other single reason?

I learned a long time ago that I don’t know what God thinks or how He works. Neither does anyone else. The problem with religion is that its subscribers believe they have it figured out and that everyone else should listen to them.

Religion also lends itself to the concept of worship. We gather together to worship God in church.

The epiphany I mentioned above is this: God doesn’t want people to worship him. He wants people to love him, to respect him, and to acknowledge his existence. But worship is a man-made creation. It is not divine.

I say these things knowing full well that I have already stated that I don’t know what God thinks. But it doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me that God would have created beings for the express purpose of worshipping him. Is he that egomaniacal and vain that he would have to create an entire species of life to worship him?

If you are a parent, do you want your children to worship you? No, you want them to love and respect you. You want them to grow up to be high achievers. You want them to be successful, but to always remember that you helped them over the hurdles of life.

Maybe God just wants the same thing for us all. He allowed us to evolve intelligence. It would only make sense that he wants us to develop it and use it, not to live our lives based on millennia-old biblical superstitions.

We are the only animals capable of understanding ourselves. We are the only ones who can contemplate our own mortality.

For that reason, centuries ago, people needed to comfort themselves about their mortality. So they invented religion. The ancient pagans invented various and sundry gods that were in charge of different aspects of their lives. They invented worship.

Those who chose to believe in the God of Abraham picked up on the worship aspect of religion from those pagans. And, throughout the centuries, styles of worship evolved into the various sacraments of Christianity.

The bottom line is that religion and worship are human inventions. Neither will grant anyone a pass into whatever afterlife there may be.

Spirituality, on the other hand, which is the most deeply personal form of faith, is what may bring our souls closer to everlasting peace and comfort. At the very least, it could bring peace on earth, something that religion has failed miserably to do.
Share:

Wednesday, February 09, 2011

Another "family values" Congressman bites the dust

http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/09/new-york-congressman-resigns-over-shirtless-photo/?hp

Judging by all the holier-than-thou right wingers who always vote the "right" way (against homosexuality, for "love" in marriage between a man and woman, etc.) and then are found not to be practicing what they preach, the more they talk about "family values," the more I suspect they are involved in something other than that.  Here's the latest one to go down.

Share:

NBC news: Diet soda tied to higher risk for strokes, heart attacks, doctors are finding

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41479869/ns/health-diet_and_nutrition/

Looks like the mainstream news is catching up, with this new warning.  There have been many warnings for years
by the alternative health community against aspartame in Nutra-sweet and in diet sodas. Just putting the word aspartame into Google will bring up tons of articles on this subject.  The very best source of articles/warnings written by many doctors -- and some articles that include the history of how aspartame was approved by the FDA (Donald Rumsfeld is involved) in the first place -- can be found at: http://www.321recipes.com/aspartame.html (a highly recommended site if you want to learn more about aspartame and how it may affect your health.)

"By all means don’t give your kids artificial-anything, especially artificial sweeteners such as aspartame or Nutrasweet. These products can negatively affect brain function, behavior, and their health." --Dr. Laura Thompson, metabolic nutritionist

Aspartame is one of the most dangerous substances ever added to food. Not only has aspartame been proven to make you fatter, it's been proven to cause some pretty serious diseases, including brain tumors and neurological disorders.  And the proof is on file already. Aspartame has brought more complaints to the FDA than any other additive--ever. It's responsible for a full 75 percent of the complaints the agency gets. From 10,000 consumer complaints, the FDA compiled a list of 92 symptoms, including death.  --
Dr. William Campbell Douglas

"Aspartame makes you fatter... After having been consulted by thousands of overweight people suffering with problems concerning the liver and/or metabolism I can assure you that aspartame will not help you in any way, indeed it will help you to gain unwanted weight."  --Dr. Sandra Cabot, liver specialist
  • Bitter Truth of aspartame - Another article. "Unfortunately, many patients in my practice, and others seen in consultation, developed serious metabolic, neurologic and other complications that could be specifically attributed to using aspartame products."

  • Radio Interview Transcript - A transcript of a 1997 Dallas, Texas radio interview with Mary Nosh Stoddard, Founder of ACSN. "..It was first approved in 1974, but the approval was rescinded because of the brain tumor issue....We compare this to the cigarette issue because it's a very close parallel. How many cigarettes does it take to cause lung cancer or a stroke, or a heart attack? How many diet drinks do you have to consume to get a brain tumor? How many spoonfuls of Equal do you have to take to have a pancreatic tumor or liver damage? The answer is: We don't know exactly what amount because it does not show up in short term testing. It's the long term effect. "


Share:

Truth that needs to be told about Reagan -- and it's about time!

The author of the following article does a good job in delineating some of the humongous lies the right wingers swallow with their daily FOX "news" brought to them by Limbaugh, Beck, O'Reilly and Hannity. The author includes the truth about the Reagan years and its failed philosophy that has brought us to where we are today:

A RICH FANTASY LIFE (being lived by the Far Right)
By William Rogers Pitt
http://www.truth-out.org/a-rich-fantasy-life67572

EXCERPT:

I know I should be immune to this by now, but I still find myself awestruck by the incredibly detailed, insulated fantasy world that the American conservative "movement" has created for themselves. No lie is too big to be told, no fact is too firm to be bent around ideology, no myth is too absurd to defend to the knife. The ability to spew deliberate nonsense into the credulous ears of Fox-watching right-bent voters - and to be utterly without shame while doing it - is the core of this "movement's" political muscle, and has been for a number of decades now.

Take, for example, this past weekend's festival of Reagan. The late president's 100th birthday opened the floodgates for an ocean of nonsense to be dumped on the American people. He was a great leader, the conservative's conservative, a small-government hero who deserves a place on Mt. Rushmore.

Rilly?

Ronald Reagan's "supply side" economic model was the gateway drug that led inexorably to the collapse of the American economy two years ago, and yet his conservative acolytes - as well as far too many Democrats who should know better - still cling to that economic model as if it were holy writ.

Ronald Reagan raised taxes massively, and grew the federal government enormously, while sending the country spiraling into a morass of debt we are nowhere near recovering from, and yet his worshippers continue to tout him as the perfect "small government" man.

Ronald Reagan and his people sold shiploads of weapons to Iran even as they supported Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in his war against the Islamic Republic. Ronald Reagan and his people basically created the Taliban, al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan as a means of carrying on the Cold War fight against the Soviet Union, and yet today his conservative followers cling to a "War on Terror" as their sword and shield.

Didn't hear any of this during the weekend's Reaganapallooza, did you? No surprise. Why let facts - Reagan was a terrible president who bears a great deal of responsibility for today's national problems, a president who exploded the debt and the size of government, a president who supported known terrorists and rogue nations with money and materiel even as they were killing Americans - get in the way of a perfectly good story line.

That's the kind of comfort bubble these people live in, and it must be a nice place to be, because they refuse to be budged out of it one centimeter. The Reagan worship we just witnessed is merely this week's iteration of an ongoing phenomenon: the creation of a parallel story line - nay, a parallel universe - to satisfy the already-calcified opinions of the far-right GOP base.

To continue reading the article, go to: http://www.truth-out.org/a-rich-fantasy-life67572

Share:

The Government's Case against Julian Assange Is Falling Apart

YES!!!  This is a wonderfully informative article!  Finally, truth is emerging about the hidden powers in government behind the madness with which we have all been forced to live.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/09/julian-assange-case-falling-apart_n_820790.html
Share:

Tuesday, February 08, 2011

Real reason for invading Iraq is surfacing

What most of us have known all along, but the controlled major media was loathe to report.  Think of all the hundreds of thousands who have died because Duhmbya wanted to be a "commander-in-chief" and the "decider"--and a bigger prez'dent than his Poppy. 

BUSH, RUMSFELD, and IRAQ: THE REAL REASON FOR INVADING THAT COUNTRY
http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/russ-baker/34192/bush-rumsfeld-and-iraq-is-the-real-reason-for-the-invasion-finally-emerging
in the major media


EXCERPT:

In Donald Rumsfeld's new book, Known and Unknown, out February 8, Rumsfeld offers an account of George W. Bush's early interest in Iraq. This was just days after the 9/11 attacks. There were no apparent reasons for Bush to focus on Iraq, instead of on the actual perpetrators of the attacks.

Here's the Rumsfeld version as reported in an advance peek from The New York Times,

Just 15 days after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, President George W. Bush invited his defense secretary, Donald H. Rumsfeld, to meet with him alone in the Oval Office. According to Mr. Rumsfeld's new memoir, the president leaned back in his leather chair and ordered a review and revision of war plans -- but not for Afghanistan, where the Qaeda attacks on New York and Washington had been planned and where American retaliation was imminent.

"He asked that I take a look at the shape of our military plans on Iraq," Mr. Rumsfeld writes.

"Two weeks after the worst terrorist attack in our nation's history, those of us in the Department of Defense were fully occupied," Mr. Rumsfeld recalls. But the president insisted on new military plans for Iraq, Mr. Rumsfeld writes. "He wanted the options to be 'creative.' "

When the option of attacking Iraq in post-9/11 military action was raised first during a Camp David meeting on Sept. 15, 2001, Mr. Bush said Afghanistan would be the target. But Mr. Rumsfeld's recollection in the memoir, "Known and Unknown," to be published Tuesday, shows that even then Mr. Bush was focused as well on Iraq.

What Rumsfeld seems to be saying, without saying it explicitly, is hugely important: that Bush's rush to war with Iraq seemed to make no sense. More than that, it was downright fishy.

Rumsfeld suggests that Bush had some kind of prior agenda that had nothing to do with any role Iraq might have had (and in any case did not) in the events of 9/11. Bush simply wanted to invade that country.

If so, why? Rumsfeld apparently doesn't speculate. But he doesn't need to.

Share:

ONE MORE THING: Re. Cults and the Scientology article in the New Yorker

I wonder how many people will recognize their own church in the warning signs I wrote about in that previous posting. The Catholic Church and Opus Dei (an elite organization within the Church) come to mind. Cults are among us everywhere, in religion, in government, in the military, and in corporations. Wisdom calls for us to notice this with open eyes:
  • Hierarchical structure, the leader and his/her "assistants" (cliquish/elite group formed around the leader) enjoying perks that the other members do not,
  • No access to the leader by the rank and file members who are expected to work for the organization with little or no compensation (and, in fact, to pay for the "privilege"),
  • Spiritual texts being quoted and used to justify and defend abusive practices against the members,
  • Leadership that sets itself above the members--with a head figure or figures in obviously elevated positions, enjoying many fruits (huge monthly income, home or homes, cars, etc.) of the labors of the members.
  • Most important, there is an implied or overt teaching/assumption that the leader is "enlightened" -- and you are not.  Therefore, you are expected to always defer to his/her greater understanding and authority, and never question it.
Controversies about Opus Dei have centered around criticisms of its alleged secretiveness, its recruiting methods, the alleged strict rules governing members, the practice by celibate members of mortification of the flesh, its alleged elitism and misogyny, the alleged right-leaning politics of most of its members, and the alleged participation by some in authoritarian or extreme right-wing governments, especially the Francoist Government of Spain until 1978.  Within the Catholic Church, Opus Dei is also criticized for allegedly seeking independence and more influence.



Share:

Knock their socks off, Keith!

KEITH OLBERMANN COMING TO CURRENT TV
http://current.com/keith-olbermann/
Share:

Monday, February 07, 2011

Excellent New Yorker report re. Scientology cult and a prominent member who woke up

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/02/14/110214fa_fact_wright

Oh, how well I know this story from the days of my own cult experience!  Like me, Paul Haggis, a Hollywood writer and director and long-time member of Scientology, one day woke up and realized, "Oh my God, I'm in a cult!"
This new article takes its place beside another New Yorker expose' of a cult, written and published in 1994: O Guru, Guru, Guru.  That article became so famous, it can now be found online in many places, including: http://www.leavingsiddhayoga.net/o_guru_english.htm

I highly recommend the following report to everyone, to show how easy it is to get caught in a cult, much easier than most people think.  I particularly recommend it to anyone seeking spiritual education in the marketplace. There are many large and small organizations calling themselves "spiritual", but if you get involved, you may find cult-like rules, iron-handed leadership, and never-ending demands for more and more financial support.  Just a few warning signs to look for:
  • Hierarchical structure, the leader and his/her "assistants" (cliquish/elite group formed around the leader) enjoying perks that the other members do not,
  • No access to the leader by the rank and file members who are expected to work for the organization with little or no compensation (and, in fact, to pay for the "privilege"),
  • Spiritual texts being quoted and used to justify and defend abusive practices against the members,
  • Leadership that sets itself above the members--with a head figure or figures in obviously elevated positions, enjoying many fruits (huge monthly income, home or homes, cars, etc.) of the labors of the members.
  • Most important, there is an implied or overt teaching/assumption that the leader is "enlightened" -- and you are not.  Therefore, you are expected to always defer to his/her greater understanding and authority, and never question it. 
THE APOSTATE
By Lawrence Wright
EXCERPT: 
Haggis forwarded his resignation to more than twenty Scientologist friends, including Anne Archer, John Travolta, and Sky Dayton, the founder of EarthLink. “I felt if I sent it to my friends they’d be as horrified as I was, and they’d ask questions as well,” he says. “That turned out to be largely not the case. They were horrified that I’d send a letter like that.”   This is a typical reaction from those who are still cult "believers" and who don't want to admit--or even allow themselves to think that they have dedicated many years of their lives and MUCH money to a cult.  For anyone who thinks "I could never fall into a situation like this," this article delineates how subtly, and easily, one can slide into a cult, without realizing it.  Cult leaders know how to manipulate and control, as I discovered from my own several years' membership in a spiritual group where I, along with many others, was exploited and abused, all the while thinking I was "helping mankind."

“I had such a lack of curiosity when I was inside,” Haggis said. “It’s stunning to me, because I’m such a curious person.” He said that he had been “somewhere between uninterested in looking and afraid of looking.” His life was comfortable, he liked his circle of friends, and he didn’t want to upset the balance. It was also easy to dismiss people who quit the church. As he put it, “There’s always disgruntled folks who say all sorts of things.” He was now ashamed of this willed myopia...

Over the years, Haggis estimates, he spent more than a hundred thousand dollars on courses and auditing, and three hundred thousand dollars on various Scientology initiatives. [His wife] Rennard says that she spent about a hundred and fifty thousand dollars on coursework. Haggis recalls that the demands for donations never seemed to stop. “They used friends and any kind of pressure they could apply,” he says. “I gave them money just to keep them from calling and hounding me.”

I once asked Haggis about the future of his relationship with Scientology. “These people have long memories,” he told me. “My bet is that, within two years, you’re going to read something about me in a scandal that looks like it has nothing to do with the church.” He thought for a moment, then said, “I was in a cult for thirty-four years. Everyone else could see it. I don’t know why I couldn’t.”
Share:

Saturday, February 05, 2011

Clarence and Ginni Thomas: getting away with as much as they can!

They're just following in the footsteps of Cheney and DeLay and so many others of their ilk.  It's no surprise that Thomas's wife is as big a liar as her husband--and a lobbyist as well (is there a difference between lobbyists and liars?).  These two are making hay while the sun shines -- and he is on the Supreme Court--for life! (sob).  He didn't report his wife's income for the last 7 years, when her income was almost $800,000 each year.  Thomas: Gee, I kinda' missed that little sum -- don't know how I did that...Oh well.  This lying, sexual-harrassing thief is what we have serving as one of the justices on our Supreme Court!  He and his wife are cashing in in every way they can, with his biased judgment making the Court votes that benefit them both.  This is what Republicans think of as "justice." Washington and Jefferson must be spinning in their graves.  Woe is us!

Clarence Thomas' wife now a Lobbyist
http://www.readersupportednews.org/off-site-news-section/69-69/4848-justice-thomas-wife-virginia-thomas-now-a-lobbyist


EXCERPT: She started as a congressional aide in the 1980s, became a mid-level Republican operative, then briefly left politics, reemerging in 2009 as founder of a tea party group before stepping down amid continued questions about whether her actions were appropriate for the spouse of a Supreme Court justice.

Now, Virginia “Ginni” Thomas, wife of Justice Clarence Thomas, has recast herself yet again, this time as the head of a firm, Liberty Consulting, which boasts on its website using her “experience and connections” to help clients “with “governmental affairs efforts” and political donation strategies....

Legal ethicists asserted that Thomas’s role could compromise her husband’s impartiality, especially since the group is not required to report its donors and could have benefited from the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling last year in which Justice Thomas sided with the majority in a decision that allowed corporations to fund campaign ads, often without disclosing their contributions.

Thomas’s role as a de facto tea party lobbyist and — until recently — as head of a tea party group that worked to defeat Democrats last November “shows a new level of arrogance of just not caring that the court is being politicized and how that undermines the historic image of the Supreme Court as being above the political fray,” said Arn Pearson, a lawyer for Common Cause, ...a government watchdog group.

“It raises additional questions about whether Justice Thomas can be unbiased and appear to be unbiased in cases dealing with the repeal of the health care reform law or corporate political spending when his wife is working to elect members of the tea party and also advocating for their policies.”

Even among congressional Republicans, with whom Thomas boasts she has close ties, the reaction to the entreaties from her new firm, Liberty Consulting ranged from puzzlement to annoyance, with a senior House Republican aide who provided Thomas’s e-mail to POLITICO, blasting her for trying to “cash in” on her ties to the tea party movement.


Share:

Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Jerusalem UFO hovers over Islamic dome

Interesting videos, taken from 2 different perspectives of the UFO sighting: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/02/jerusalem-ufo-spottings-o_n_817689.html
Share:

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Monday, January 31, 2011

Losing your memory? You're gonna' love this song!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HzSaoN2LdfU&feature=youtube_gdata_player

Get ready to laugh! I think most of us can recognize ourselves in this one!

Share:

Tim Pawlenty says Michele Bachmann would be a strong candidate for President

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/31/tim-pawlenty-michele-bachmann-president_n_816231.html

Oh PLEASE, PLEASE let her run!  Oh, PLEASE, PLEASE let her be the Republican candidate!!!  Oh PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE!!!!

Share:

Fascinating 45-minute online video -- Missing Secrets of Nikola Tesla

The Missing Secrets of Nikola Tesla  from The Phenomenon Archives -- Dean Stockwell, host
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2188562935002257117#

This is an excellent presentation of the work of Nikola Tesla.  It also reveals many of the "secrets" of Tesla's experiments that are no doubt being used by our country today (HAARP weather experimentation, for instance). Immediately upon Tesla's death in 1943, the FBI rushed into his small hotel room and took away all of his papers, which they made sure were kept hidden from the public eye. 

If you are at all curious and think of yourself as a seeker of truth in science and government, this video belongs on your "must-see" list.  Once you have viewed it, you may have a broader understanding of gpvernment mysteries in our present day.  For certain, you will experience wonderment at the lost opportunities of our world because of the greed of a few power-mad men such as J. P. Morgan.  Without their personal arrogance and lust for power, fueled by fear and greed, our world could have been completely different today.  But unfortunately those small-minded men would not allow us to benefit from the free energy Tesla was offering the planet.  Tesla was a man born too soon -- a man of genius and high consciousness, whose ideas and ideals were too far beyond the ken of the lower types on the planet.  That is still true today.  We are a species that evolves very slowly when it comes to consciousness.  J. P. Morgan and Dick Cheney,
men of the same low consciousness, would have been best buddies had they been born in the same time period.

If you decide to view this video, I think you will agree it was well worth your time.  Even if you know about Tesla and his work, the video can add even more knowledge of the man--and the missed opportunities of our world.
Share: