Sunday, June 18, 2017

Excerpt from a new book--can you guess who it's about?

Excerpt from a new book by Howard Jacobson, written in the form of a fairytale:

REVELATION
And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea ...

And the beast which I saw was like unto a hyena; and his feet were as the feet of a clown; and his face was as the face of a spoiled child ...

And the people gave him his power, and his seat, and great authority ...

And they worshipped the beast, saying: Who is like unto the beast? who is able to make war with him?

And there was given unto him a mouth speaking foolish things ...

And he opened his mouth in blasphemy against truth ...

And it shall come to pass that all who dwell upon the earth shall wonder that they worshipped him ...

And they shall know that the beast came not out of the sea but their own hearts ...

And they shall fear that once let out, the beast will never be persuaded to go back in again.
Share:

Saturday, June 17, 2017

Touching message by Rev. Wm. Barber - not to be missed!

In case you missed it, here is a straight-to-the-heart reminder given by Rev. Barber to all Americans today on the AM Joy show.  Worth viewing many times over. 

http://crooksandliars.com/2017/06/preach-rev-barber-takes-us-church-after

This morning, Joy Reid said what many of us were thinking this week:

"After this week's shooting in a GOP congressional baseball practice left Democrats and Republicans calling for unity, rallying around Congressman Steve Scalise, who still remains in the hospital, in critical condition," she said.

"But despite the current kumbaya, the political divisions are still very real and have moral implications. Who better to discuss than Dr. William Barber? If ever I needed a pastor, Reverend, today is the day.

"This idea that Republicans now have, they're saying that we all have to come together. We have to rally together. When you heard them saying that, what did you hear?"

"Well, first of all, we should be in prayer," Barber said.

"We should be unified in our concern for the congressman and the two officers that were wounded. But first, we should also be deeply concerned about the three people who were killed on the same day. Representative ryan said, 'When you attack one of us, you attack all of us. Well, this can't just be a moral ethic that you apply to members of Congress.

"That's why the real question is, will one or two days of changes in personality mean a fundamental change in public policy? That's the moral question.

"I've been thinking about this, Joy. All of those that were injured needed health care. So now will they go back to work and say, every American deserves health care, deserves what we received, and we will preserve the Affordable Care Act and make sure pre-existing conditions are protected?"

(Yes! That's something may of us have said.)

"Since they could have died, will they repent of efforts to take money from Medicaid that will help poor people and disabled, many of whom have died without that? A black man from my alma mater saved their lives," he said.

"Will they go back to work and restore the Voting Rights Act and stop systemic racism against black people? A lesbian black woman saved them. Will they go back to work and no longer promote laws that attack the human rights of LBGTQ communities?

"They were shot by guns allowed to be carried openly. Will they go back and challenge laws that allow people to get guns easily so they can get votes? They were shot by a white middle-aged man for political reasons. will they change the practice of profiling terrorism as a fear of Muslims and violence that's mainly rooted in the urban black area.

"Tone is fine, but if the policies are terrible, we don't have civility," he warned.

"They were saved by good police, so will they therefore challenge bad police like the guy in the (Philando) Castile case?

"These are the serious moral questions that have to be answered more than just one or two days of shaking hands and playing a game. because this is really not a game.

"It's a delicate thing, because everybody is wishing the congressman well and hoping that he recovers, but Steve Scalise has a history that we've all been forced to sort of ignore on race," Reid pointed out.

She reminded viewers Scalise came to leadership after a controversy over attending a white nationalist event, his co-sponsorship not just of a bill for a constitutional amendment limiting marriage to that between men and women, but also a repeal of the ban on semiautomatic weapons.

"Because he is in jeopardy and everybody is pulling for him, are we required in a moral sense to put that aside in the moment? " she asked.

"What we're required to say is, we hope he recovers and when he recovers, he's got a new mind-set. If a lesbian person saved your life, you should not go forward being homophobic. You shouldn't be, anyway.

"If you almost died, but your life was saved because you got health care, you should apply that ethic and want everybody else to have the same health care you have. The Bible, one of the guys that prayed, (Rep. Mark) Walker from North Carolina, he was saying how he prayed for everybody.

"The Bible says in Isaiah 10, woe to those that legislate evil and rob the poor of their rights and make women and children their prey.

"The Bible says, wherever you just put on a face in a time of crisis, but continue to do the same thing, it's called making graves look good that are still full of dead men's bones.

"In other words, it's hypocrisy. If congresspeople pray for one another, and they should P-R-A-Y, but then if they pass policies that prey, P-R-E-Y, on the poor and the minorities and the sick, then we have a serious moral problem.

"And even our Constitution, the way you can get to domestic tranquility, the only way you can get to civility, is you must start with the establishment of justice. You must provide for the common good and you must provide the general welfare. Changing the tone of words is not enough.

"You have to have a change in the trajectory of policy. prayer is not enough. Faith must have works. So I'm praying that the brother gives up and lives and then comes back and says, 'This experience has changed my thinking fundamentally, not just about myself, but about the policies I support.'

"And lastly, Joy, they talked about raising $1 million for charity. That is good. But if you turn around and take $600 billion from the poor and the least of these, and you don't pay a vote to give people a living wage, personal privatized charity is not going to solve our social problems when it comes to the poor and the uplifting of the least of these."

They continued to a discussion of the hopelessness many of us feel this morning after the verdict in the Philando Castile murder.

"What would you say in response to the sort of feeling of few tilt and hopelessness that I think a lot of us feel, a lot of people feel, when you have an instance of police-involved violence, that there's really actually no hope of justice for the family. What do you say to people that feel that way?" Reid said.

The reverend said in moments of despair, he read and studied people who faced other seemingly hopeless moments.

"Now, I wish that the moral universe argument bent quicker and I wish we didn't have to have the suffering. but what we can't do is ever give up," he said.

"On our own humanity. On our own standing for what's right, even if right does not come fast, quick, and in a hurry. And there is a legacy of doing that.

"You know, I remember, Joy, when I was reading the other day, I went to the store the other day, and (civil rights martyr James) Cheney's nephew worked on my cell phone. And we were talking about that.

"When they were killed, the young people didn't come out of Mississippi. They went to Mississippi. And so I believe we're going to need continued seasons of non-violent resistance.

"Don't quit, don't give up, continue to stand, because we must honor the lives of those that have been slain violently by bad police for standing up for what's right."

EVERYBODY SAY AMEN.

Don't give up. Every single moral action has a ripple effect.

Share:

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

Is Trump Making America Mentally Ill? You'd Better Believe It!


Is Trump making America mentally ill?


President Trump. (Andrew Harnik/Associated Press)
 Opinion writer, Washington Post June 13 at 7:54 PM 

In one of Walker Percy's brilliant novels, "The Second Coming," protagonist Will Barrett keeps falling down for no apparent reason. He also suffers trances during which he contemplates existential questions.

Barrett comes to mind in the era of Donald Trump.

I'm not falling down on the golf course yet, as Barrett did, but I confess to a feeling of lightheadedness coupled with slight nausea. It makes perfect sense that Barrett finds salvation in a young woman recently released from an insane asylum.

When many of those around you seem to be suffering from some sort of group mania — believing what isn't true and defending what isn't defensible — then the officially "insane" offer some strange solace. At least there's a rational explanation for their disorder.

Today, about a third of the nation's population seems to be suffering from a reality discernment malfunction. Have they been ingesting mushrooms plucked from bull dung? Drinking water spiked with credulity-enhancing chemicals?

Thus, when President Trump speaks in his fourth-grade, monosyllabic, syntax-challenged verbiage, they hear lyrical lucidity. When he brags that he has accomplished more than any other president, save for Franklin Delano Roosevelt, his starry-eyed minions nod their approval. Exactly no major legislation has been passed by Congress since Trump took office.

As Trump himself said, he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and they'd still love him.

This is the definition of reciprocal madness, which seems to have spread to the highest levels, as witnessed Monday in the strangest Cabinet meeting in American history. Chief of Staff Reince Priebus said it was a "blessing" to serve the president. Each secretary matched his example in what became an epic, circular kiss-up, praising Trump's leadership (do you suppose the last lemming thanked the first?) and expressing his or her gratitude.

"It's an honor to be able to serve you," said Attorney General Jeff Sessions.

"I am privileged to be here," said Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta. "Deeply honored."

"What an incredible honor it is to lead the Department of Health and Human Services at this pivotal time under your leadership," said HHS Secretary Tom Price. "I can't thank you enough for the privileges you've given me and the leadership that you've shown."

The only way to process such tortured effusion is to remember James B. Comey. You either profess loyalty or you go back to being a member of the privileged class so abhorred by the very folks Trump tempted at the ballot box.

Most reserved in his remarks was Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, who praised only the men and women of the Defense Department, not Trump. A scholar, thinker, combat veteran and leader, Mattis knows full well what evil lurks in absolute power. The blessing is that there's at least one among the crowing crowd who puts country first and worships no mortal man.

But what to make of the rest of these Americans who seem unburdened by such concerns? Or this president, who still can do much harm? More than two dozen top psychiatrists, psychologists and other mental-health experts hope to provide some answers with a book due out this fall — "The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump."

They don't diagnose Trump, which ethically they can't do without examining the patient. They do, however, discuss his symptoms, which lead them to conclude that Trump is a "complex, if dangerously mad, man." They also propose that his mental illness is affecting the nation's mental health as well.

These experts will likely learn what many journalists have discovered: Only the already convinced will read the book, and the rest will remain convinced of their certitude. The trouble is that when one is daily immersed in clouds of distraction, it's difficult to recall what "normal" looks like.

Before long, I wouldn't be surprised to see a movement of Americans dressed in all-white and smoking cigarettes, mutely watching their former friends and family go about life as though everything were the same. Barrett doubtless would find solace in such company, refugees from the Asylum of the United States.

Let's just hope we're not watching through concertina wire.

Share:

Monday, June 12, 2017

Who could ever believe a concert featuring a song to God would be so popular?

Famous Indian performer A.R. Rahman sang a Muslim song to God at a world-tour concert audience in Sydney in 2010, stirring love in the hearts of the audience. It is heart-warming to see even little children cheer and get up dancing and singing to a devotional song (see English translation of some of the lyrics below).  The fact that people of all faiths attend Rahman's concerts and relate to this music is heart-touching proof that we all are One Heart/Being, no matter what labels men's minds may try to use for separation and division. The soul recognizes divinity in music when it hears it, even if sung in a different language than one's own. I believe people of all faiths are also stirred by songs like Amazing Grace or Holy Mother (sung by Pavarotti and Eric Clapton, see below) when sung in English, even if they are of other cultures and languages.  I think most people would agree we need more moments of coming together like this in our world.

Watch the video for yourself.  Even without understanding what the words mean, it would take a very hardened heart not to be stirred by the song, the singers and the audience's enthusiastic appreciation for the divine music being presented in this concert. (~.~)


A visibly stirring presentation of this same song appeared in the Indian epic film Jodhaa Akbar. You can see the song being sung and danced by Sufis in this excerpt from the film:

Khwaja Mere Khwaja-Jodhaa Akbar - YouTube

▶ 6:51
Oct 15, 2009 - Uploaded by Sahana Sharma
Song-Khwaja Mere Khwaja/Movie-Jodhaa Akbar/Cast-Hrithik Roshan,Aishwarya Rai. ... my fvrt song ...

and 

Pavarotti & Clapton Holy Mother For War Child 1996 - YouTube

▶ 5:56
Jun 6, 2009 - Uploaded by gkoriel
In this benefit concert for Bosnia in 1996, Eric Clapton performed a song he wrote for the Blessed Mother ...


Khwaja My Khwaja Lyrics

Noble Khwaja, Khwaja
Noble Khwaja, Khwaja, Noble Khwaja
O Benefactor of the Poor
Khwaja my Khwaja
Fill my heart
You are the King of Kings...
 
 
Khwaja my khwaja
It is in your court, Khwaja
That I have seen light
It is in your court, Khwaja
That even the saints bow...
 
Khwaja my Khwaja
Fill my heart
You are the King of Kings...
 
O Noble Khwaja
You have saved me from all miseries
I am imbibed with the wine of your love...
Your feet are my guides, it is unthinkable to leave them
 


Khwaja my Khwaja
Fill my heart
You have undertaken the fate of the helpless
Khwaja my Khwaja
Fill my heart
You are the King of Kings



Share:

Sunday, June 11, 2017

Trump tells Priebus, "Clean up the White House mess by July 4th or ELSE!"

Pathetically ironic, because the only way anyone could ever clean up that mess would be to tell the mess maker in chief, "TRUMP, YOU IDIOT, YOU'RE FIRED!!!!"

Trump gives Priebus July 4 deadline to 'clean up' the 'mess' in the White House — or lose his job

President Donald Trump has ordered his Chief of Staff Reince Priebus to "clean up" the White House by July 4, according to a Sunday night report from Politico, or lose his job.
Share:

Wednesday, June 07, 2017

What was REALLY being communicated by Intel heads in today's Congressional hearings?

Feeling frustrated and angry about the performance of Coats and Rogers in today's Intelligence committee's hearings?  Read the following for an interesting take on it all.  Tune in tomorrow for Comey's testimony -- and pass the popcorn:

http://www.palmerreport.com/opinion/quiet-rogers-coats-trump/3355/







Share:

Monday, June 05, 2017

Former Kushner employee dishes on Trump's racist con game with conservatives

TRUTH COMING OUT FROM THOSE IN THE KNOW (but it won't be believed by Trump voters who can't admit their own motives and must maintain complete trust in their "dear leader")

From: Palmerreport.com

If you've ever wondered whether Donald Trump truly believed the racist "birther" lie that he spent years hurling at President Obama, you may not have to wonder any longer. A former employee of Jared Kushner is now dishing on what Kushner told her about Trump's true motive behind the lie, and what Trump really thinks of the people he conned into voting for him.

Elizabeth Spiers was the editor of the New York Observer at a time when Kushner was running it. She now claims that Jared Kushner told her years ago that Donald Trump never believed the birther nonsense, and that he only touted it because – in Kushner's words – "Republicans are stupid and they'll buy it." (source: GQ). If you're not the kind of person who falls for that kind of lie, then you probably already knew this. But it's still stunning to hear someone from within the Trump-Kushner inner circle confirm it.

Trump was right, of course. Conservatism is a carefully crafted set of convenient excuses aimed at allowing people to blame others for their own faults and failures. Racism is one of those core tenets. Why should a failure of a white person admit that he simply blew it in life, when he can instead choose to believe the lie that some other demographic of people somehow robbed him of the life he should have had?

So it was easy for Donald Trump to play on the inherent (conscious or subconscious) racism of white conservative Americans by giving them an excuse to discount the fact that the first black President was smarter and classier than they were. If they could believe that he was secretly born in Kenya, and that he was somehow some kind of invention or fraud, then they could discount the entirety of his existence. Trump made white conservative losers feel superior to Barack Obama, and it made them deeply indebted to Trump. But now we have confirmation that Trump himself never believed the racist lie that he spent all those years feeding those losers.
Share:

Saturday, June 03, 2017

Revealing In-depth psychoanalysis of Trump, with warnings about where his behavior will lead

Psychoanalyzing Donald Trump


  
by Michael Bader | June 3, 2017 - 6:56am

— from Alternet

I'm going to psychoanalyze Donald Trump. In so doing, I may seem to be violating the "Goldwater Rule" that enjoins psychotherapists from diagnosing public figures based on second hand information. However, I happen to agree with the consensus of a recent conference of mental health professionals at Yale University that argued that mental health professionals have a "duty to warn" people about the danger posed by Trump's mental illness).

I'm going to analyze Trump because I think that media analyses have been too superficial and that understanding Trump more deeply can help us decipher actions and attitudes that might otherwise be bewildering. In my view, there isn't anything quirky or confusing about Trump's psychopathology. It makes perfect sense if seen through the right lens.

Most approaches to psychotherapy assume that people naturally avoid painful emotions. One person can't tolerate feeling dependent; for another, it's anger; and for still another it might be guilt. People do all sorts of things to avoid the danger of feeling painful emotional states. They might simply deny them (e.g. "I never feel sad"). They might exaggerate the opposite. (E.g. I'm powerful, not weak, happy not sad," etc.) Or they might project these feelings outward, thereby making an internal problem into an external one. (E.g. "I don't hate the world; the world hates me." ) These are examples of psychological defenses. More often than not, the difficulties that people experience in their lives—or create for others—come from their attempts to defend themselves against emotional pain. Their solutions, in other words, become a problem. So, for example, if someone fears feeling angry, he or she might assume an exaggerated position of meek compliance which might then lead to situations in which he or she is inauthentic or self-sabotaging. Or such a person might externalize feelings of anger and become paranoid about imagined aggression in others, believing that he or she is the target of others' anger. Such a person is chronically defensive and mistrustful of others. A paranoid person is very hard to get along with.

Our psyches are wired to seek to eliminate or escape painful feelings. Sometimes, however, emotional states feel so dangerous that a person's efforts to safely avoid them have to be similarly extreme and involve distorting reality. And if that person has a lot of power—the President, for example—such extreme defenses pose a serious threat to others.

Donald Trump's psychopathology is expressed primarily by his defenses against certain painful feelings. I would argue that among the emotions he most likely dreads the most are inferiority, helplessness, and shame. This triad lies at the heart of what makes Trump crazy. Trump can easily be diagnosed, as many have done, as a "malignant narcissist"—someone who has, according to the DSM-V, a narcissistic personality disorder but who, in addition, shows prominent symptoms of paranoia and an inability to feel guilt or remorse. Such a diagnosis, while accurate, is simply descriptive and doesn't go deep enough into the real sources of his pathology. It's not enough to diagnose him. Instead, we have to understand how a man with such a diagnosis is likely to feel inside, the fears and desires that motivate him and the strategies he uses to escape painful emotions. Understanding how Trump is constantly defending himself against feelings of inferiority, helplessness, and shame brings us closer to the truth. Viewed this way, malignant narcissism is merely the shape that Trump's defenses –the defenses of any malignant narcissist for that matter--take as he struggles against the threats of this triad of feelings.

For example, take Trump's extreme grandiosity. He is always the biggest, the best, and the greatest. This self-aggrandizement makes sense if it is seen as a defense against feeling small and insignificant—in other words, inferior. The exaggerated degree of his grandiosity is a measure of the depth of his dread of being inadequate. Similarly, Trump surrounds himself with a type of garish superficial beauty (gold fixtures in the bathroom, and golden trophy wives) to counteract feelings of lack of worth. In other words, this surface is absurdly glorified in order to counteract feelings of internal damage. Further, his incipient dread of feeling small (for example, his obsession with proving his hands are not small) is also defended against by projecting "smallness" onto others. We all remember that Marco Rubio was "little Marco," and he calls people he doesn't like "losers," thereby reducing the pressure of feeling that way about himself. Over and over again, he paints his critics as losers, petty powerless people, momentarily escaping a dreaded belief that he is the real loser.

Trump is constantly battling feelings of shame and humiliation. We know that because he is frequently expressing "disgust." Disgust is a way to keep shame at a distance. It's a way of saying that something bad isn't inside, it's outside, and disgust warns us to keep away from it. Trump can barely contain expressions of disgust and contempt. During the campaign we saw this defense emerge in regard to women; he was disgusted, for example, by Hillary's use of the bathroom during their debate at Saint Anselm College, and fulminated about Megyn Kelly's bloody secretions after she was tough on him in their first debate. Even Trump's alleged sexual preference for "golden showers" during a sexual tryst in a Moscow hotel speaks, if true, to his struggle with shame. A sexual fetish like this is his attempt to overcome feelings of disgust by enacting a disgusting scenario (being urinated on) but scripting it so that everyone is sexually excited rather than repelled.

Trump is obviously extremely vulnerable to feeling shamed and humiliated. Moreover, I would argue that, in general, he finds women to be essentially and especially disgusting and avoids getting too close to these dangerous feeling by using women as things. Relationships with things are safer than actual intimacy and exposure.

Shame, helplessness, and inferiority are mutually reinforcing. Helplessness and inferiority are shameful and being exposed as pathetic or inferior increases feelings of vulnerability and helplessness. The threat of experiencing all three of these emotions can be seen in Trump's by now famous inability to pay attention in meetings or to read. When he has to pay attention for too long, I think he begins to feel anxious, as if he is being helplessly cornered and made to feel one down, and he can't stand it. Further, if he has to consider a difficult problem or focus on material about which he is ignorant, Trump has to face feelings of being flawed, helpless, and embarrassed. In other words, he begins to feel like a stupid loser and he can't tolerate it. So he has to interrupt and quickly change the subject to one with which he's comfortable or one that features his greatness. In this way, he relieves himself of dreadful feelings of being defective. Such feelings trigger his private fear that he is, indeed, insignificant and weak.

For someone plagued with feelings of helplessness, shame, and inferiority, the danger of exposure is ever-present. Such a danger is captured by the colloquial expression "being caught with one's pants down." It shows up in our dread of incontinence, of an involuntary disclosure of one's private secrets or "tell," of being found out. But found out as what? In Trump's case, it's found out to be dirty and bad, unworthy and defective, instead of deserving and greatly valued. This is also why he is a conspicuous spender—also a defense. Trump is consumed by this conflict. His paranoia reflects his constant worry about the critical judgment of others, a worry that, in his heart, Trump secretly fears is justified. As a result, he is angrily fixated on being "found out" by investigative reporters or exposed from within by "leakers."

In the context of such a formulation, it makes sense that, more than anything, Trump dreads revelations that make his electoral victory last November seem illegitimate. He simply cannot tolerate the fact that he lost the popular vote nor even a hint that the Comey letter and/or the Russians helped him defeat Hillary Clinton. In Trump's disturbed mind, this makes sense because he is horrified by feelings of being a loser, horrified by evidence of the dirty fraudulent underbelly that might lie at the foundation of his personality and life. He has to stamp out this accusation—which is really a self-accusation—at all costs.

In his years as a real estate tycoon, Trump could exercise enormous control over his environment, sanitizing it of any evidence that contradicted his idealized version of himself. He could surround himself with flatterers and the trappings of wealth and power—the external cues that he is special. As President, however, he finds himself under constant hostile scrutiny, and this scrutiny threatens his defenses. He is constantly compelled to preemptively reassert his invulnerability, his power and greatness, which come across as what they are: boorishness--a braggart desperately trying to save face.

If reports are true, Trump frequently loses his temper, striking out and blaming others for chinks in his narcissistic armor. Of course he does. His outbursts are a belated attempt to master and control an environment that is relentlessly whispering—actually, at times shouting--that he's a bad, inferior, defective man. He can't stand being the helpless victim of these whispers and shouts. He'll do anything to shut them up—fire press secretaries, obstruct justice, bribe allies, anything to restore the moat defending him against criticism.

Real losses—say, votes in Congress—are psychically equated with being a loser. Revelations that his campaign colluded with Russia are psychically equivalent to admitting that his victories weren't real. Impeachment, of course, would be the ultimate realization of Trump's nightmare—proof that he is helpless, damaged goods, a public failure, and that everyone is contemptuous of him. Such a trauma could produce extreme and radical reactions, from a frank psychotic break, to a reckless military attack, to resignation and a panicked flight back to his private castle in Trump Tower.

Knowing what makes Trump tick doesn't allow us to make specific predictions about his likely political positions, but it should make his frantically chaotic and sociopathic maneuvering around the Russia investigation seem quite understandable. I'm sure that intelligence agencies around the world already have a book on how to deal with Trump that is based on analyses of his personality similar to this one. As part of his domestic opposition, we ought to understand at least this much, namely that Trump will always be propelled by his defensive need to prove that he's good, not bad, powerful and not weak, a winner and not a loser. This need will lay behind everything he does.
_______

ABOUT AUTHORMichael Bader is a psychologist and psychoanalyst in San Francisco. He is the author of "More Than Bread and Butter: A Psychologist Speaks to Progressives About What People Really Need in Order to Win and Change the World" (Blurb, 2015).
Share:

Friday, June 02, 2017

Sean Spicer has checked out -- his answer to every question: "Ask Trump, the Ultimate Decider"

Tired of being berated and screamed at by the "Great Decider," Spicer has now made his job much easier -- he just directs all questioners to ask Trump himself, knowing the Donald will never give an answer.

Fox's Chris Wallace and Shep Smith marvel that White House reps are ignorant of Trump's climate views


Share: