Monday, November 11, 2013

Elizabeth Warren: Hillary's Worst Nightmare

I'm for Elizabeth -- all the way.  Check out this site to know why she would be the best presidential candidate ever:
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115535/ten-baddest-elizabeth-warren-clips-out-there?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=intext&utm_campaign=curated

Watch the videos of her questioning the big banks and Tim Geithner.  Outstanding!

She wondered at her very first Senate hearing why so few Wall Street banks are ever taken to court--and kept asking: "When was the last time a bank was taken to trial?"  The answers (very last video on the link noted above) were mealy-mouthed, to say the least, when those questioned had to answer the obvious: Never.

Read the following article to find out why Elizabeth would be Hillary's biggest nightmare:
http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115509/elizabeth-warren-hillary-clintons-nightmare?utm_source=internal&utm_medium=flyout&utm_campaign=mostpopular

Share:

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Conservatives alarmed about Pope Francis

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/us/conservative-us-catholics-feel-left-out-of-the-popes-embrace.html?hp&_r=0

This very unusual Pope actually seems to be practicing Christ's teaching--what a concept!  But the conservatives are sharpening their knives and he had better be careful.  We have seen many times what terrible crimes can be committed by conservatives who are upset about social issues.  We've seen the killing of gays, blacks, doctors who performed abortions, and yes, even the murder of Pope John Paul I, who also wanted to make changes that made the conservative cardinals surrounding him aghast. (Read reviews in blue below of important investigative book "In God's Name").

Unfortunately for all of us, those who prefer to have everything defined in black-and-white terms (racial pun intended) never seem to change their point of view willingly. They have to be dragged kicking and screaming to make even small changes in social/religious/political/you-name-it issues.  They would like everything to stay just the same as it was in their childhood--or in their granddaddy's day.

The people protesting Pope Francis in the Catholic church today pray to Saint Francis and revere statues of him but would have feared and ridiculed him when he was alive in Assisi.  When a Pope appears to be actually emulating St. Francis and his merciful compassion for all beings, the "orthodox" Catholics are horrified and run to the protection of cut-and-dried rules and dogmas.  There appears to be no room for growth or change in their world--or for expansion of the heart.

So....what do they do when someone threatens their cherished ideals?  Well, we've already seen what some of the most fanatical conservatives are capable of.   Pope Francis is walking in dangerous territory, but I get the feeling he is more attuned to love than to fear.

IN GOD'S NAME by David Yallop
David Yallop is a highly regarded investigative journalist and "seeker of justice." He has overturned opinion with every book he has written, continuously uncovering injustice and truth in his research into the Derek Bentley case, Carlos the Jackal, and the murder of John Paul I.

This is a difficult book to digest for faithful Roman Catholics like myself. It is the story of a wonderful priest who loved the poor and wanted the church to improve the quality of life for Catholics. Pope John Paul the First was a man who would not seek to impose christian solutions on non-Christians; he was someone who was sensitive to social problems and open to dialogue; with a commitment to the search for unity; a good pastor, a good shepherd in the way that Jesus was; a man who sincerely believed that the church should not be out of date but be a relevant, nurturing factor in the lives of Catholics worldwide. However, I think it is important for all interested in the pursuit of truth to read this compelling book and drawn one's own conclusion. The evidence is hard to ignore. The conclusion is based on facts. It is truly hard to imagine but I am now convinced that Pope John Paul the First was murdered because he dared to promote positive change and rid the Vatican of corrupt banking practices. Highly recommended.

Bert Ruiz


When I first started reading the book, I thought well,it might be interesting to learn some more about the Vatican. I didn't know it was going to be so breathtaking. I remember I heard my father comment when pope John Paul I died that he has definitely been murdered. I was young at the time and knew nothing of the ways of our world. After reading In God's Name, I have no doubt that there was a murder. Mr. Yallop's certainly knows how to conduct a research and more importantly, how to write his conclusions without passion (although his feelings do transpire and his positions with respect to corruption and crime are very clear).

However, for myself, the important part of the book was the description of Pope John Paul I. The life of this charismatic man, this priest of Christ, is simply beautiful. And the Catholic Church has lost with his death its chance to become what it never should have ceased to be: the church of the poor. This book for me was full of the spirit of papa luciani. And the corruption, the crimes, were set on one side, and this true priest on hte other. And somehow, He weighed much more in the balance.

Corruption and crime, wars all around the world, conflicts in the middle east area moved by the interest of the few, all this is the reality of our daily life. To know that we can do little to avoid a war because it would be bad for business bears a great dose of despair in itself.

But then, the good news will not come from the leaders. Only from the humble and poor men and women who dedicate their lives to relieve other people's pain and suffering. The leaders will never be allowed to be that. In a way, maybe papa luciani should never have become pope.
Read more ›

By brent howell on August 6, 2005
Format: Mass Market Paperback
"In God's Name" gets the prize as the most professionally written book about the mysterious death of John Paul I. Its limitation is that it restricts its investigation to the Great Vatican Bank Scandal - yet, there is much more than just that. Although a work of fiction, Yallop does such a riveting job of telling his tale that one is left with the convinction that everything he has to say actually happened - the mark of a great writer. If one wants the facts about the Great Vatican Bank Scandal turn to "Pontiff' If one wants the most comprehensive published record of all of the known facts surrounding the mysterious death of this good man turn to "Murder in the Vatican" by Lucien Gregoire. The latter is also the only existing biography of this Pope - of his struggles as an impoverished child - as a revolutionary priest as an outspoken bishop - and as a compassionate cardinal. It is written by a man who spent much time with this Pope.

By Robert M. Logan on January 9, 2005

A mere 33 days after Albino Luciani became Pope John Paul I, he died. To the date, the cause of death remains unknown or at least it remains undisclosed to the public. No autopsy was preformed. No official certificate of death was released.

Author David Yallop follows the footsteps of Albino Luciani and chronicles his life and journey to Rome. Yallop reveals the process and speculates on the politics of the election of John Paul I. His investigation provides a detailed sketch of the final hours of Pope John Paul I, drawn minute by minute.

In the book, Yallop names six individuals who had much to lose under the reign of John Paul I. He asserts that these individuals: a Bishop; two Cardinals; two bankers; and the head of a secret organization, P2; applied the "Italian Solution" either alone or in some combination. Now twenty years after this book was first published the author's website claims that the central questions raised remain unanswered and the frightening accusations are still undisputed.

I found Yallop's development of the cases of motive for the six suspects to be strong. Although motive does not equal guilt, it does help make Yallop's theory of murder plausible.   Wonderfully, author Yallop has included pictures, lots of them.

Share:

Saturday, November 09, 2013

How the World shrugged off Kristallnacht 75 years ago

http://abcnews.go.com/International/world-shrugged-off-kristallnacht/story?id=20826565

And we're still shrugging off things we should be paying strict attention to:  Climate change, chemtrails, nuclear power disasters, fracking, disastrous leadership in most countries including our own, religious fanaticism, and not least, UFOs and alien visitation (perhaps overseeing) of our planet, etc., etc., etc......

Share:

Friday, November 08, 2013

One ObamaCare Scandal We're Not Hearing About At All

http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2013/11/08/the-obamacare-question-pastors-shun/?hpt=hp_c2

EXCERPT:
The coverage gap in states that refused Obamacare

The coverage gap was created when 25 states refused to accept the expansion of Medicaid under Obamacare. The people who fall into this gap make too much money to qualify for Medicaid and not enough to qualify for Obamacare subsidies in their state insurance exchanges. If they lived elsewhere, they would probably get insurance. But because they live in a state that refused the new health care law, they likely will remain among the nation’s uninsured poor after Obamacare coverage kicks in come January.

The coverage gap has been treated as a political issue, but there is a religious irony to the gap that has been ignored.

Most of the people who fall into the coverage gap live in the Bible Belt, a 14-state region in the South stretching from North Carolina to Texas and Florida. The Bible Belt is the most overtly fundamentalist Christian region in the country, filled with megachurches and pastors who are treated like celebrities.  All but two Bible Belt states have refused to accept the Medicaid expansion under Obamacare.

Should Bible Belt pastors say anything publicly about the millions of poor people in their communities stranded by the coverage gap? Is it anti-Christian for state leaders to turn down help for the people Jesus called “the least of these"? Or should pastors say nothing publicly about such issues because they are strictly political?

This article covers these questions.


Share:

Wednesday, November 06, 2013

Strange, strange world we live in....

Interesting one-after-the-other positioning of headline stories on ultra right-wing Drudge Report site. I doubt that Drudge even noticed it: 
CENSUS: 49.7 Million Americans Living in Poverty...
DOW HITS NEW HIGH...
Share:

You may not believe your eyes with this one

It looks like a water bird of some kind swimming by in the water, doesn't it?  Guess again. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBnS_fNIyq0

Share:

What happens if you make someone feel rich and another feel poor?

Intriguing study:  watch this video and see what happens if one average person is made to feel rich (such as in playing Monopoly) and one is made to feel poor.... very interesting report on human nature.

http://truthseekerdaily.com/2013/10/take-two-normal-people-add-money-to-just-one-of-them-and-watch-what-happens-next/

Share:

Tuesday, November 05, 2013

The Elite Super Rich Don't Need the Middle Class Anymore (or so they think)

The following article tells the sad tale of what has happened in our country because we allowed huge tax cuts for the rich, manufacturing/marketing globalization and the reduction/elimination of corporate regulations, resulting in runaway capitalism. Don't know if you've noticed, but we no longer live in a democratic republic.  It is now an oligarchy. But it will crack and crumble into ruins because the rich are ignoring a truism, attributed to the American Indian Chief Seattle:

"This we know; the earth does not belong to man; man belongs to the earth. All things are connected like the blood which unites one family.  All things are connected. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it.  Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself."

The Super Rich Think They Don't Need Our Middle Class Infra-structure
By Thom Hartmann

America is falling apart — and this nation's super-rich are to blame.

There was once a time in America when the super-rich needed you, and me, and working-class Americans to be successful.

They needed us for their roads, for their businesses, for their communications, for their transportation, as their customers, and for their overall success.

The super-rich rode on the same trains as us, and flew in the same planes as us. They went to our hospitals and learned at our schools.

Their success directly depended on us, and on the well-being of the nation, and they knew it.

But times have changed, and the super-rich of the 21st century no longer think that you and I are needed for their continued success.

And in some ways, they have given up on America, period.

As Paul Buchheit brilliantly points out over at AlterNet, "As they accumulate more and more wealth, the very rich have less need for society. At the same time, they've convinced themselves that they made it on their own, and that contributing to societal needs is unfair to them. There is ample evidence that this small group of takers is giving up on the country that made it possible for them to build huge fortune." 

Buchheit goes on to say that, "The rich have always needed the middle class to work in their factories and buy their products. With globalization this is no longer true... They don't need our infrastructure for their yachts and helicopters and submarines. They pay for private schools for their kids, private security for their homes. They have private emergency rooms to avoid the health care hassle. All they need is an assortment of servants, who might be guest workers coming to America on H2B visas, willing to work for less than a middle-class American can afford"

Unfortunately, these millionaires and billionaires who have given up on America and on the working class are in control of the political process in this country.

They have brainwashed Republicans into thinking that the success of working-class Americans no longer matters for the future of this nation.

As a result, Republicans are no longer investing in things that have traditionally made America - and the working-class - successful.

Take America's infrastructure for example - or lack thereof.

According to the American Society of Civil Engineers annual report card on America's infrastructure, America's infrastructure is a mess. 

Our roads are falling apart, our transportations systems are in turmoil, and our energy and electrical systems are stuck back in the 1900's.

A new graph released by investment research firm BCA shows why. 

Non-defense related infrastructure spending was around $325 billion per year when George W. Bush stepped foot inside of the White House.

Today, it's around $235 billion per year, a $90 billion drop in funding from when Bush took office.

Republicans, brainwashed by America's super-rich, have repeatedly refused to fund comprehensive infrastructure spending bills, all in the name of austerity.

But cutting funding to the nation's infrastructure isn't the right way to address American's debt or spending problems. And it certainly isn't the right way to rebuild this nation.

As Cardiff Garcia over at The Financial Times points out, "It's also likely that much of the investment that has been forgone in the name of fiscal consolidation will have to be made eventually anyways - only it will be made when rates are higher, exacerbating the long-term fiscal outlook rather than improving it. And as Think Progress points out, "continued underfunding in this arena over the coming years will cost businesses a trillion dollars in lost sales and cost the economy 3.5 million jobs." 

The Society of Civil Engineers says that it will take a staggering $3.6 trillion investment by 2020 - or $450 billion per year - to bring the American infrastructure into the 21st century, and to avoid risking a complete infrastructure collapse.

But the super-rich don't care about how much funding is needed to save this country, as long as they have their private schools, private hospitals, private airports and private places.

The super-rich in this country are bleeding working-class Americans dry, while destroying the infrastructure of the nation that has done so much for their success.

No matter what Jamie Dimon, Charles Koch, or Shelly Adelson will tell you, America's wealthy elite did not make their fortunes on their own.

Without a strong economy and infrastructure, America's millionaires and billionaires would not be where they are today. It's that simple.

So what can we do right now to rebuild America's infrastructure and give a boost to the American economy?

First, it's time to bring an end to globalization.

We need to be protecting American jobs, instead of letting the super-rich ship them overseas and build factories in China and third-world countries.

But more importantly, we need to roll-back the Reagan tax cuts, and make sure that America's wealthy elite are paying their fair share to support our economy and infrastructure.

Right now, the burden for rebuilding America is on the backs of working-class Americans, and that's just wrong.

It's ridiculous that working-class Americans struggling to survive day-to-day are paying more in taxes than billionaire banksters and oil tycoons.

A lot has changed in America over the past 100 years or so but one thing remains the same: The success of the super-rich still depends on the success of you and me.

The super-rich still need us for their roads, for their businesses, for their communications, and for their transportation.

Our infrastructure may be crumbling, but there's still time to get America back on the road to success.

We're all in this together.
Share:

Virginia gov. race: choice between cancer and heart attack

Or between dog poop and pond scum: take your choice. This is what we have come to in politics. The little kid at the end of the video makes the most intelligent comment:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/11/05/holy-sht-this-is-a-nightmare-the-daily-show-analyzes-virginia-governors-race/

Share:

Monday, November 04, 2013

New TWA 800 documentary--a MUST-SEE

http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/TWA_Flight_800/70279444?trkid=13462050

Brand new documentary. It's on streaming Netflix -- watch it as soon as you can.  It tells how the real truth about the fate of TWA 800 was swept under the rug by the CIA and FBI.  This documentary was made by the federal investigators whose reports were not allowed to come out.  They are now petitioning to have their reports and analysis included, as well as the hundreds of eyewitness accounts that were deliberately ignored by the appointed CIA/FBI investigation team, who lied about the reason for the crash (and actually interfered in deleterious ways to sabotage the investigation). Their false report attributed the tragedy to an internal explosion in the fuel area. The truth is it was an EXternal explosion caused by a missile, probably fired by our own government, perhaps by mistake, perhaps not.  How will we ever know unless the eyewitnesses are heard and the investigators' reports are allowed to be included?

Aren't you tired of all the secrecy about so MANY things?  Don't you want to know the facts that are being kept from the public by our government?????  This film is saying "ENOUGH!  Let the truth come out and let the chips fall where they may."  Highly recommended.
Share:

Heart-touching performance



This moving performance should be required viewing for all the world's leaders. If it didn't touch their hearts and make them strive for world peace, nothing would.  God bless this man, his brother -- and their incredible, loving adoptive mother.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY37l4PDsao&list=RD02jMPvKpA0xfs


Share:

Another stunning voice from America's Got Talent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3WPZBNwXPA

Very emotional...his story was a sad one, but he's happy now. (~.~) What a voice!
Share:

Talented 9-year-old sings opera in Got Talent show

From Holland's Got Talent show, this remarkable little girl with her incredible singing voice has become a star: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEMR3A4WLC8

She taught herself to sing -- and has had no lessons.  Amazing!

Share:

Saturday, November 02, 2013

Laugh for the day -- The Phallic Church



You couldn't make this stuff up! (~.~)  It gave me a hearty laugh!




Share:

Fascinating lost Disney UFO documentary

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DHunekX1xPw

You may be surprised at how strongly the UFO presence on Earth was declared in this Disney UFO documentary, which was made in 1995 and was shown only once--and only in 5 states--and then disappeared from the airwaves forever.  When you view it, you may think, as I do, that it was meant to prepare the masses for a revelation from the government that we are being visited by extraterrestrials.  It certainly doesn't mince words in its presentation.  You would think from watching it that a government admittance of the presence and visitation of UFOs was immanent.  Yet, it didn't happen.  And this documentary was suddenly gone and never seen again. Fortunately, someone had recorded it on VHS at the time (now transferred to HD) and is now presenting it on youtube, for all to see. 

It has been rumored that Steven Spielberg was enlisted by the government to start preparing the masses for UFO understanding--and that his movies Close Encounters of the Third Kind (1977) and ET: The Extra-terrestrial (1982) were efforts toward that goal.  This Disney documentary may have been another later link in that design. 
Evidently, at some point, minds were changed in the powers-that-be about how much control they would lose if the entire world population were informed of the truth about UFOs.  The rulers of our world seem to have decided we aren't ready for such a government-sanctioned revelation, or that the loss of their control over us would just be too great. Documentaries like this Disney film were pulled back from public view. 

However, little by little, earth human consciousness is being raised, despite the efforts of the powers-that-be to ride herd over our minds and keep us dumbed down and under complete control.  Many other governments (France, Spain, Russia, etc.) have opened their government files on UFOs to the public.  U.S. files have been leaked by military and government members who think the rest of us should know the truth, and some documents have been eventually revealed through the Freedom of Information Act.  It can hardly be called a secret anymore that we have been, and continue to be, visited by extraterrestrials from other planets in the galaxy and/or other dimensions.  Yet, highly credentialed government and military witnesses who are trying to get their stories out to the masses are continuously ignored and/or ridiculed by the controlled major media.  Thankfully, we still have the Internet to give us truth, if we are curious enough to search for it.

I hope you agree with me that this is MOST important information for "we, the people" to know!

Share:

A must-see online film re GMOs, available to view only next 6 days


THIS FILM COULD CHANGE YOUR LIFE:  http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/11/02/genetic-roulette.aspx?e_cid=20131102Z1_DNL_art_1&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20131102Z1

If you want to know more about Monsanto and GMOs, please watch this free weeklong streaming of the hour-length version of Genetic Roulette—The Gamble of Our Lives, winner of the Top Transformational Film of 2012 by AwareGuide and 2012 Movie of the Year by the Solari Report.

Featuring testimony from healthcare practitioners, scientists, veterinarians, parents, and others about the health risks of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food, this powerful documentary shares the amazing stories of individuals who saw undeniable improvements after switching to a non-GMO diet. (If you don't have time to watch the film, please read the article excerpts and the GMO chart I've included below)

Last year, during its first free showing week, Genetic Roulette garnered over 1.25 million views. Viewers were so moved that many made the decision to eliminate GMOs from their diet before the credits rolled, and subsequently reported profound improvements in their health.

This film could change your life too! So please, take advantage of this opportunity and forward this important film to all of your close personal friends; share it with others on Facebook and Twitter.

VERY IMPORTANT EXCERPTS:

You’ve probably heard that “genetically engineered crops have no impact on the environment” and are “safe to eat.” But did you know that federal departments in charge of food safety in the US and Canada have not actually conducted tests to affirm this alleged “safety”? Since 1992, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has maintained that the agency is unaware of any information showing that GMOs are significantly different from conventional varieties, and so therefore safety studies are unnecessary.

But, as discussed in the film, some 44,000 pages of secret internal memos and other documents forced out by a 1998 lawsuit shows that the FDA has lied about the safety of GMOs since the very beginning... According to Steven Druker, an attorney and executive director of the Alliance for Bio-Integrity who coordinated the lawsuit against the FDA to obtain mandatory safety testing and labeling of gene-spliced foods:3

“As I combed through those 44,000 pages of memoranda and other documents, I was shocked. Because it became clear that the FDA had lied repeatedly since 1992; they claimed that there was an overwhelming consensus within the scientific community that these foods were safe. But the overwhelming consensus within their own scientific staff was exactly opposite. These foods could not be presumed safe.

...What Monsanto and the biotech industry wanted from the FDA was a policy that created the illusion that genetically engineered foods were being diligently regulated but, in fact, impose no burdens at all; [a policy] that in fact had zero regulation. And the FDA has pulled that off masterly.”

How could such a thing happen, you might ask. Well, once you realize that the person in charge of policy at the FDA at the time was a former Monsanto attorney, Michael Taylor, the answer should become fairly easy to recognize. Taylor later became Monsanto’s vice president. And now he’s back at the FDA again as the US Food Safety Czar...

How to Avoid GMOs

There are nine primary GE food crops, the derivatives of which can be found in more than 70 percent of supermarket foods, particularly processed foods. If you want to avoid GMOs, make sure none of the following are on your grocery list or in the foods you buy, unless they are USDA certified organic:

Soy Cottonseed Corn
Canola oil Hawaiian papaya Alfalfa
Sugar from sugar beets Some varieties of zucchini Crookneck squash

 

Also avoid any product containing aspartame, which is derived from a GE organism, and any milk product that may have rBGH. I recommend consuming only raw, organic milk products you've obtained from a trustworthy local dairy farmer. The Institute for Responsible Technology has put together a helpful Non-GMO Shopping Guide you can download and print. They even have an iPhone app.

Your best bet, of course, is to buy organic whole foods. By buying organic, you will dramatically reduce your exposure to pesticides, hormones and antibiotics, as those are used on nearly all GE crops. Get to know your local farmers. Many are too small to afford official certification, but may still adhere to organic, sustainable practices. The only way to determine how your food is raised is to check them out, meeting the farmer face to face if possible. Yes, it does take time but is worth it if you are really concerned about your family's health.



Share:

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

Very interesting: Huge UFO spotted by NASA last month

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JyE8saz2Mk  Physicist Michio Kaku: NASA has spotted a huge UFO --"we don't know what it is!"

NOVA presentation on Parallel Universes -- very interesting program with Dr. Brian Greene and other prominent physicists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MTrtpZTEmSY
Share:

Do Rabid Republicans REALLY take Cruz seriously?

It's hard to believe anyone could take him seriously--he is the worst clown ever in the worst circus ever--the Republican Party as it stands now. The following article nails the truth about him, but it's obvious the Bubble Dwellers think of Cruz as their crusading hero.  (head shake and sigh)  They still like Bush and Cheney, too. (double sigh) And they loved Joe McCarthy during his evil heyday.  What is left of "moderate" Republicans are horrified. 

The truth is, it looks like a battle between the two kinds of Extremists who have taken over the Republican party.  The neocons (Cheney/Bush: "we make our own rules") against the Tea Party radicals. One of the battles will be playing out in Wyoming as Liz Cheney (neocon) takes on already seated Republican senator Mike Enzi, an ultra-conservative liked by the Tea Party, in order to achieve more power and wealth for the Cheney family. 
The Tea Party's Rand Paul backs Enzi.  Liz Cheney has already sold her gay sister down the river by appealing to the Tea Party's prejudice against homosexuals.
She will say and do anything to achieve power--a real chip off the old block. 

Take a good look at the people representing the Republicans today: Cruz, Cheney, Palin, Rand Paul, Joe the Plumber, etc.
  It's difficult to imagine that any intelligent person would want to be a part of that group.  Read the following article for an accurate assessment of Cruz:

TED CRUZ: THE MASK OF SINCERITY
By David Denby

When Ted Cruz lies, he appears to be praying. His lips narrow, almost disappearing into his face, and his eyebrows shift abruptly, rising like a drawbridge on his forehead into matching acute angles. He attains an appearance of supplication, an earnest desire that men and women need to listen, as God surely listens. Cruz has large ears; a straight nose with a fleshy tip, which shines in camera lights when he talks to reporters; straight black hair slicked back from his forehead like flattened licorice; thin lips; a long jaw with another knob of flesh at the base, also shiny in the lights. If, as Orwell said, everyone has the face he deserves at fifty, Cruz, who is only forty-two, has got a serious head start. For months, I sensed vaguely that he reminded me of someone but I couldn’t place who it was. Revelation has arrived: Ted Cruz resembles the Bill Murray of a quarter-century ago, when he played fishy, mock-sincere fakers. No one looked more untrustworthy than Bill Murray. The difference between the two men is that the actor was a satirist.

Cruz is not as iconographically satisfying as other American demagogues—Oliver North, say, whose square-jawed, unblinking evocation of James Stewart, John Wayne, and other Hollywood actors conveyed resolution. Or Ronald Reagan—Cruz’s reedy, unresonant voice lacks the husky timbre of Reagan’s emotion-clouded instrument, with its mixture of truculence and maudlin appeal.

Yet Cruz is amazingly sure-footed verbally. When confronted with a hostile question, he has his answer prepared well before the questioner stops talking. There are no unguarded moments, no slips or inadvertent admissions. He speaks swiftly, in the tones of sweet, sincere reason. How could anyone possibly disagree with him? His father is a Baptist, and Cruz himself has an evangelical cast to his language, but he’s an evangelical without consciousness of his own sins or vulnerability. He is conscious only of other people’s sins, which are boundless, and a threat to the republic; and of other people’s vulnerabilities and wounds, which he salts. If they have a shortage of vulnerabilities, he might make some up. When the Senate Armed Services Committee was discussing Chuck Hagel’s fitness to be Secretary of Defense, last February, Cruz, who had been in the Senate for about a month, said that Hagel was weak on Iran, adding, “It is at a minimum relevant to know if that two hundred thousand dollars that he deposited in his bank account came directly from Saudi Arabia, came directly from North Korea.”

His strategy is universal aggression, aimed at everyone. Well, not quite everyone—lately, his popularity with the Tea Party cohort has increased. And at a recent rally at the convention of the Texas Federation of Republican Women, he was greeted with heated adoration. But normally Cruz resembles one of those war chariots with blades flashing from the wheels; he tries to cut up everything in his path. When things go wrong, he only sharpens the blades. From the Senate, he urged House Republicans into a government shutdown and a sustained threat not to extend the debt ceiling. When the President held firm and the Republican leadership backed down, the fallout included collapsing poll numbers for the Republican Party and the possibility, mentioned by nonpartisan political analysts, that the Democrats could pick up a serious number of seats in the House in 2014.

But, rather than acknowledge any responsibility, Cruz told Dana Bash, from CNN, that “the single most damaging thing that has happened to Republicans for 2014 is all of the Senate Republicans coming out attacking the House Republicans, attacking those pushing the effort to defund Obamacare, and lining themselves up opposite the American people.” He has repeated this charge—the betrayal, the stab in the back—in many forms. He has been wronged, his cohort has been wronged, the American people have been wronged, traduced by weaklings and cowards in the ranks. In Cruz’s rhetoric, the American people are always being wronged.

Last February, when he questioned Chuck Hagel, some senators suggested that his insinuating manner—the bullying slurs, the implication of treason—reminded them of Joseph McCarthy. Since then, comparing him to McCarthy has become commonplace. Physically, though, there is little resemblance. McCarthy had a heavy, rounded head, a dark-shadowed jaw, and thick eyebrows. He spoke in an amazing strangled feverish whine, which now seems almost a put-on. There was a “network of professors and teachers who are getting their orders from Moscow, from an organization that wants to destroy this nation, that wants to corrupt the minds of youth,” and so on. It was the sound of fear: Communism was taking over the country imminently, and he was the only one capable of preventing capitulation. The conspiracy was so vast (it included the United States Army and perhaps President Eisenhower) that he couldn’t actually describe it. He could only imply its extent—his voice, with its elongated vowels and lengthened final consonants, told us that evil, unless it was stopped, would go on and on, consuming everything.

Cruz speaks crisply. Still, like McCarthy, he evokes a menace that is destroying the nation: Obamacare, which is killing jobs, obliterating businesses, demoralizing everyone. Obamacare is his Communism, a conspiracy that is the main impediment to economic growth. It is a malaise that is particularly hurting “single moms, Hispanics, African-Americans”—a brazen touch on Cruz’s part, since it is exactly those three groups whose interests Republican policies tend to ignore. It takes a certain ingenuity to suggest that an attempt to insure the powerless is rendering them powerless. One of Cruz’s tricks is to turn his enemies’ words back on them so that they stand accused in their own language. Meanwhile, he remains, at least rhetorically, invulnerable behind a mask of sincerity.

Cruz voted no on the bipartisan immigration bill, no on the farm bill, no on the continuing resolution; he voted against the confirmations of John Brennan, Chuck Hagel, John Kerry, and Jack Lew. He makes extreme demands, then accuses the other side of being unwilling to compromise, then calls his own party members cowards, and so on. The refusal to extend the debt limit endangered the American government and economy. What does Cruz want? What is he up to? The naïve may believe that all of these obstructionist moves are part of a principled opposition to Obama, the President who, in the past, inspired greater and greater outrage in Republicans in proportion to how conciliatory and mild he became. But Cruz seeks more than the humbling of the President. There are plenty of other Republicans around eager to accomplish that.

He seeks the Presidency, of course. And he appears to be doing it by sowing as much confusion and disorder as possible—playing the joker in a seemingly nihilistic charade whose actual intent is a rational grab for power. Does he have a chance? One wonders about his supporters. Are they in on the joke, aware that his concern is a mask? Or do they take him literally, as a truth-teller and a prophet? Are they cynics or true believers? If they are cynics, he will fail; if they are true believers, he could go very far, expanding his support in a messianic crusade, a quest to purify and redeem the nation.

Prior to the next election, Democrats can’t do much to deter him. They may hope that he continues his rampage, turning off big money and more and more of the electorate. His immediate threat, obviously, is to moderate Republicans. If he continues to blaze, they will be consumed. Then again, there is another side to the Joseph McCarthy story. After going too far—attacking the Army, in 1953 and 1954—McCarthy was censured by the Senate, in December, 1954. (He died less than three years later, of liver problems, at the age of forty-eight.) When the mask of sincerity gets smashed, the man wearing it may break apart, too.


Share: